From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16707 invoked by alias); 29 May 2018 00:08:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 42873 Received: (qmail 11243 invoked by uid 1010); 29 May 2018 00:08:39 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(74.125.82.49):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.484492 secs); 29 May 2018 00:08:39 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bfHKBFGs/Lj2TDixy+NGPTPVrf+5ATXILz4/WKRrWn4=; b=1hIms3veLmjYrWcsVtTuXlnX8De9pDMQM6unXP8ny7ZwqByeEFqzM2Z0a52H/lhbHc 8pC+D1BTAMRdc74CZ2giJhAB/T+pNXgRX04z57SggcrxMawXitFwRVnBk/H+Ef6wTGcT zD/Jy+AA0p3cFs4XQDTn4VjqYrInHRjwOlzL0wttX+Ss+Ak6tBXzihgqxgGUPc3Z2/UT jVbszxkPv+BdU3Dd52SaKGYummA5sRShY1iwuJIDFWGFzaQsPi+8P9Qgqrj38GuUWgOw 2bmaDEA6yLMhVy/Yt4bMvVytFy6F5F9U/n6tDWE1CU1gnCwUKRehrxtBvWtYR68ZtlB/ 2ZsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bfHKBFGs/Lj2TDixy+NGPTPVrf+5ATXILz4/WKRrWn4=; b=BU373s2z/Y5p8JG112I5By8f7M0CyovHR0nvbLj8JMTeHE3p0s2jkVJaZRiDChfqC+ e7+bmunz82akkS9XsH86btvChzs3ES3d8xBXUljB7McQdNG2XIZTNnSO0hPD/61SDbRg 2mdFeTRu+MSHyEstgo2SOxM6Q5zOEzcv+M+EkM6rAKUOf4rLr7hBh4CEIB7C8x8pDFZP Y8NxzkQIuVu5a7sSJgRvucay9IKRkTUOW3lgJozxx/eOefjQBsy2SE3uyRUaaPIF7x8M UoUWEU1WD32iY3VfpT8qaQQG1bBKMK4Fb8vWQiRO7hdao7pbd7nR+jf3/jY9gmByZQ8d 3yOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwc7Bz38w51/CywGDU/8cWZtPpxro+B5JluX4JvhcRGOoKJLxtsI zCLUnCO1j6Ut34oLmHo3fke6ENBovYdMsL/+DkR+EQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIl2g/Kf58ONFBwkQ7eWX3HYpPosErxsbccS6mbOrtknrJ5hOtDLuK2Te1CWMYbtfSTll1OeFR+4y1VNUy75ZE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b89:: with SMTP id z9-v6mr9498468lji.121.1527552514030; Mon, 28 May 2018 17:08:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Bart Schaefer Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 17:08:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: (z) flag little crazy when '((' closed with *single* ')' To: "Jun T." Cc: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Jun T. wrote: > > If the lexer can't find the closing '))' on the command line, it tries > to interpret the opening '((' as '( (', i.e., nested subshells. The right way to handle this is probably to extend the (Z:...:) flag to have an option to start parsing in math context.