From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4082 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2021 22:35:42 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Apr 2021 22:35:42 -0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; t=1618094142; b=BSkjhGrOJ2ypkSnve+vw+6GNsTn+PVaiDGcplKntI1OyMidMW3rP5pLv6redq4pqGslbwgu4lL lGRqUsp6+C4q8RGwgmtXyr07RccfoSiIsGk3lxME+5lgbldDlwI/sp2gnHnnFJK0pj8v8ozSX9 CrV/Khdi7Cc4hk9gfZwZDhX71YKUTtz9J4oWX/+NNFZe4CGtXGuFL7/VEMINUwXTpS0TYIsOxS l6XzZtY36fA5GIoExmsJiuGNh/hiXfuo0PbcrnwsJ1JZuTqbsgGFU69iutVGj06PvfwTIQlG70 UcKtNefNHMQ1y+G+2b9YS8uT9mZEUxrEpbySYqvOODTeFQ==; ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; zsh.org; iprev=pass (mail-oi1-f182.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.182; dkim=pass header.d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=brasslantern.com; arc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; t=1618094142; bh=0ebQiyhYOnUGd7942Hpg+192mIbZvj00XlDVMArZ51Y=; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature; b=tr+7a8T4ymQHjOXuO84DDM/aAa2EvF+eKN4PvkuDJHE6x+z18fuG+xKSi0UwgRm9f/1aQHh+Uo ocFMryKN1oAJQd3WcYo4i+bpdTAUBJeJleYjBJFW4otS/iCOq5/ahws7gETWQXeNSebCcjmtTY w8vFUAzorZReMCPkgW4KZr0rWZgQXvXMF8bGQ3iBFTTE+3lXFqUpd/M5JB4gcVVCLUyjgmHdoC Yp7siWEb9SSLp6JJ0HsZTP6xt3anKHQ41T89o0SQ83DmtsTfT6QLj0kakCXuCs6om4CZYp0ZbD EK0U+ThnPybs3YSLc0GrMeY8MWf1AzINMbafQe7MBweNFQ==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID :Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=GTK+TweG22j2jhYCBHCTTvbjxUIFENHIStzKIFxVsK4=; b=GTUvBOUCTQe/gFcbSasWrjKHK4 uMxKF5WcGe4wr7P8rfnEsZMCGeH9jdRRqV42tHYbxnqZW4riH/qrSgxsxqwD4UkVStGMAEo6mm39r eM68Bg2OeZJHKyXNM3GPQcDiCxyzeST7JwoeZj6YYTGBxQRNGA4cGlZWYTna7CmAHKKlMChUdNVWt QjgBSp+AnaNnQR7ex5KBn0syrGsqQVQiT7h9WNXypgu6sBp4qXV6L72lJ8Ff+dr5GbrPoVCuEleXs QjZcdb3R4lf4SXk/MspH5MbDCVy/YtoxLDxoEi9kH+o9KTd88dVkvAQzIc3HH9Ur83rj1+V/hZx6h PkfFnZEA==; Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with local id 1lVMCb-000HCh-JH; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:35:41 +0000 Authentication-Results: zsh.org; iprev=pass (mail-oi1-f182.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.182; dkim=pass header.d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=brasslantern.com; arc=none Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com ([209.85.167.182]:42720) by zero.zsh.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1lVMCK-000GwY-UG; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:35:25 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id n140so9656591oig.9 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:35:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GTK+TweG22j2jhYCBHCTTvbjxUIFENHIStzKIFxVsK4=; b=D3DQoF+phA6ZPodq6GpWhrRxBKunPyE9ldg3LLu3rjlzUtYlxVzwgj4Ay1Kr68tGjq 0IcUDOpcRglsnc5j4W6HYGW9PfksQqe7vqTrgi/kQr8nwqbV0IXPVdbMIsDXPl9a9ulp +ZB9TNYJ0ahh3Ieex47AHBA7GWkwY+4+zZEP8vSF4eoaNvwC9H0ZHXC2SFE3frYr75UL GPEw4bOrBjGW7rRzT7OnXaSI7M5o3pWChiIDXr6fH7V74DTiASsIIjXS5J7tg/+yf/bz EiMK+B80eiSjDnDpTxjGxlQH4QPsH+uslvwc9eBIlKyfoKIvJCN23ZLVmBeBXTnFUPWa 4GKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GTK+TweG22j2jhYCBHCTTvbjxUIFENHIStzKIFxVsK4=; b=PlZJQ05sq0nFAvRSBI59gKLc6jVe+51C4GplIp2+w/VHBbXqusrKRJb/Ob1SelnGTO yWcm/quyNgX2zZYN0mrlhiRRE/Dz0BXLoiPjYMgWcOBCMSJL/2hoTHkx2mJdWRY+vv9R xKhNnBJfwj9WqZlzf+a5W67TfcZzFriq3vw/Uuk+DSkyzEaSAhzDj1e63lpt8c1zr5TG x56OxQ8SfljTZ1AvAtYQjyIdp2+g+lIPCC4iayN8s0k8TLj8a1z4auZCwrseZXJydvwu QXueVU6/NzPF9GNlg9/ciDlBDKx5D+rEuE6gjSm+wzXfwHTlYwAbGC4kFRXpbGvwke5h /72A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tQifB9794PjYRlWO++El+iOwGI5gbs8+udEEheGObAewpOJIS WjKADQEER8Fkhty8Da7ZkGbsBt4c9R8TcOfwfDwnig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYiDgG5ioJTpY0TOVHw7ddXrv1z7ACXPXF9moc+D3roehCG3BhZnwbWBFwDmZ1Glh1tf94ausofU8o5L3WEaY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:8d2:: with SMTP id k18mr9602295oij.132.1618094123777; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:35:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201228221342.136199-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20210104061718.GB14783@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <4e9d7283-94fa-4862-ab04-8c3294f3876c@www.fastmail.com> <83994-1616978678.232193@jPMH.zQZs.0I47> <63964-1618091881.198315@P0pm.eEwl.WXLl> In-Reply-To: <63964-1618091881.198315@P0pm.eEwl.WXLl> From: Bart Schaefer Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:35:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] declarednull: rename DECLARED to NULL To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Seq: 48489 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 2:58 PM Oliver Kiddle wrote: > > I don't really have a strong opinion but would like to see the work > finished off and pushed. I did another forced-push on the declarednull branch after rebase on master (though a couple of other master changes flowed in almost immediately after that). > never easy to name these things. A problem with TYPESET_DOES_NOT_SET is that it leads to the double-negative NO_TYPESET_DOES_NOT_SET, which isn't as bad as NO_NO_whatever, but argues for an option that is treated as "on" for the existing behavior. Bleah. If I do add a separate option, do you think it's OK to combine that with POSIX_BUILTINS for the tests in the (new) E03posix.ztst file? Otherwise all the tests in that file will have to be repeated twice (with and without the new option).