From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13613 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2015 20:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36014 Received: (qmail 10437 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2015 20:40:05 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Rhw7BVZmm6JDM6JIH3KWuUHLKSH+MeNGsxOIrwCf59U=; b=KO+MvcBra3XwzscxDy0Uvol7l+Lu/EkLEzT7Hm4c+BCugIXwnYChLA6DKmebhP9xtc XgQ3RfkXNAcJyfdAar10R5hTEnrsj4LytWsM+pFqGOwjSk4VGuE+464c6ziR4p5t2zv0 bUrtbdGg2PhN6aG2AUycneUMxLyDfrKKJ3ZrzVCr2HLXf1SeqQFmWYwK3CVOFxdOO/6H 6iPM9AgSQtNI3/Kw6B0BtxZsVevZ3zRGHpPlAa8JK8HEetpTMz34WQQ/III66ZTuy5sO 5w96mhZbdrNtKZ1hbtvPUfNLVUy17/V/CryCQ1wmclH3J2yixLpEBZZ7nwuRZV6SJG3/ vrQA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlvYQ1PX9APfvGX+9fIl4/htQQNHhtgdsitH8DmOkbOPymT2VCypHE8nQ3DEnKMTAsVRu6k MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.71.165 with SMTP id w5mr25172172wju.135.1439066400988; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:40:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150808200521.4e3c85d1@ntlworld.com> References: <20150808200521.4e3c85d1@ntlworld.com> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 13:40:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 5.0.9 eventually...? From: Bart Schaefer To: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcef9ea3b591051cd2c170 --047d7bfcef9ea3b591051cd2c170 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Aug 8, 2015 12:11 PM, "Peter Stephenson" wrote: > > Anyone (including Bart, obviously) with a feel for what's the state of > affairs with regards to immediate problems? Nothing has been done about the infinite loop with "wait" printing the job status. After pointing out that ksh and bash differ in wait implementation, I got distracted by the signal handing deadlock thread. I have what I think is a comprehensive patch for that signal issue but am AFK today (writing this message on my phone). Will post later. I posted a sort-of patch for the "typeset -T" crash, but I agree that it is not the ideal solution. That's as much as I'm aware of from memory. --047d7bfcef9ea3b591051cd2c170--