From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36251-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 11764 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2015 17:25:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36251
Received: (qmail 2852 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2015 17:25:44 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=COT0N+W6tqTpPKk6Q9rTpgftunGzbszT9DJbbyT10D0=;
        b=mbXIjPC4F/HkOnFrM8k4GDwZd1NebrYBuRBlURKo/BfeS05casQe+yW/igFRkU12NA
         mt0bP9mRXUUJVgijd8CbBS1QoG3Q4leQAwNR90solRq5W3otdQW1IHk2/a8cTb92VOJc
         fauqiTOvnZyB7WYeYBJ63T9Tc1I7hEcnilOKDXtmNbuel2qGVl75aiQQlA301tDXSDCt
         SCx1fLVvdMH59wndDhWPk0zc1pcY3MyNhGxd/bjOm5fx+bZxJ2AtKPETZAokxGGOvrAs
         xE0RZW8/j64wwe2F3og2k9Ca/fQXRGTrx9U9vTjDLDfSkU4nO1HqzftllCCWOOOqqIzD
         GkjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlHHRYl11CdYy3vh0UPnTFQ//WcLziPFDcexXQhq7ETTwQktjKjriLShcohpyR39t+ZvTKd
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.125.194 with SMTP id ms2mr3961046lbb.58.1440091538896;
 Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150820174206.4d0c6e02@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
References: <1c959278.16c49.14f4ad2908c.Coremail.ed.young@ruicheng4wares.com>
	<20150820174206.4d0c6e02@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:25:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7atmwHxK9EjhFNq7GNpWpHHSS80DxeJ9-FTyVKFJ4CqDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 5.0.9 / 5.1 agani (ws Re: Recommend latex surgical gloves)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Stephenson
<p.stephenson@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> I'm getting bored with 5.0, since the 0 is a bit pointless, and thinking
> of calling it 5.1 (no third field).

Would this mean we move away from the three-field version numbers
entirely, or would e.g. we do 5.1.1 if there were some small but
urgent fix needed (as there seems nearly always to be, as 5.0.6/7/8
demonstrated)?

> There are some quite useful bits of
> enhanced compatibility here and some quite significant bug fixes.

Yes, a surprising amount of significant progress for a short time.
Several "why didn't we think to do it this way before?" sorts of
updates.

> There's nothing in the README yet about the new paste behaviour, which
> there needs to be --- virtually everyone is going to run into this.  (I
> know it's in NEWS but it needs to be very clear.)

Is it worth mentioning how to turn it off, rather than just pointing
to the parameter doc?

> (By the way, in case you're keeping count, in the source tree as a
> whole, including generated docs but ignoring binaries, the score is
> currently:
>
> behaviour: 582
> behavior: 169

Yes, and we could probably do a similar analysis on colour and programme ...