From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: zsh-workers-return-43768-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 208badec
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:20:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 2861 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2018 23:20:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 43768
Received: (qmail 5585 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Nov 2018 23:20:31 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.167.49):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 2.315739 secs); 05 Nov 2018 23:20:31 -0000
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=eqros6GYQqwWXYpfNbACby0q3M10/xkESHOXlItV2do=;
        b=BOtcxyz0Q1XL24HmLMldbFGmzuORdZz7jctQB0H3G0mA3pqARPRMP/m2II6hn9BgR6
         kM9uCRJBHxfaeaKWpX4AnkUtD4BfG9JigYdET36dJSmm7HC6t6BBBcxKulpLjFprIgY4
         x/QlbYzMvpwb8wR5oy6NyAINIj8+utdrkbj9kWOt387VTil6fNxJtwt7tgP/5A9Tglz0
         UQUzdNnczQbtQe57rb87URGvo5gDdYDG4uoFV18AgRwhsgh9KD2hYUaYc8D79nxaCO0u
         AQHSGnRZLUgB3+PkTEpupdjos3J5mqJauVd7WaDtS61MyImVW0TiK2Qf0lyEbaYyS5/X
         vSsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=eqros6GYQqwWXYpfNbACby0q3M10/xkESHOXlItV2do=;
        b=ApZlc5ClyBzKfrSWqcfem7nagGOurV1ISiOsh3P7Bta3WBBOFOboOarod43wHdHFNM
         5ZzAOlwGB8AboimIZB9vp25opGtAT4H8g1YzGoizms8GYMO706B4mJjxHnxBhUuUZxRy
         X99cqw7Msg0nUKOtXfP3jm1AuM9ouMzVVAsDTMsmpwIu9Z/XyxsH0PdCnEfbKTf8umxv
         ZpaP5qlHTac2oRt3axO3+SIm8Nky6GiU/LZoWzVe5cOUp3hkFIwN7K83lvmyv3Gp7qyY
         y9EcAj3ojGb+dvYOwmJcQxr7NJp3NxIKoYr+VCjwgewp1IhTlJu7swMlpQ0NFXUVLBU5
         TQ+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKXRUbBVTbW2crmpbb+E5XvBtZ+oh1Dm4J8cs85dVlEyN5aZH6Z
	EwXN3+laF7omtUTlarBrLwCRiKnX/BEt2N9M4kVrNQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5df8YeJ6AZ9CW3fQYJhT7M35eonQmf97ZntkIiCQeAEIUdLcP7th3L6Uv1aWYrxkXRzwIf7jUz+j0BF9KQ+8ZY=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:9609:: with SMTP id y9mr13203152lfd.114.1541460024431;
 Mon, 05 Nov 2018 15:20:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKc7PVCdqYwOrYr5-7bzduNsJd9OAUz0B-68jg_D5MqMUiVnKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1BE52C46-161F-412B-A539-4B0EA87A2FCE@dana.is> <CAKc7PVAReJOH_T24hZ3qEMpyZGaXat3Ak7muYg9vJEC6HZKhag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH+w=7ZH7tkqcSu6gPd6yOXosa2bGg2n6YtLU2x7rtU2gqsn6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKc7PVCWY1hLgpcxj+v3-ZqiuzM435WsERE_QA130_1YSVMbXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH+w=7YD_ovhQUJtcPjUY0gTgr2x_H+xpi0zaoW18pguvWDd7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKc7PVAZeUwxaYM3pHh91ggGAAwEYQvghwtc0u0JBQkMgBDj-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKc7PVAZeUwxaYM3pHh91ggGAAwEYQvghwtc0u0JBQkMgBDj-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:20:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7bKitYPWLy_0Aw-fdW_sqeBCUZGzhr2Lp5RzpUwdNvHXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in "-quoting and @-splitting, could someone elaborate?
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>
Cc: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:04 AM Sebastian Gniazdowski
<sgniazdowski@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've rephrased the Zsh Native Scripting Handbook, its section about @.
> Maybe you could have a brief look, about the correctness of the
> statements?

It's a bit of a convoluted way to come at it, and the explanation of
(A) is kind of buried in another topic, but I don't see anything
actually wrong.

If I were to suggest edits, it would be to separate the KSH_ARRAYs and
Zsh native cases more fully, rather than mix the exceptions into the
flow as you have.