From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16030 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2017 14:50:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 41546 Received: (qmail 22230 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Aug 2017 14:49:59 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-qt0-f175.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.216.175):SA:0(-1.4/5.0):. Processed in 2.176684 secs); 14 Aug 2017 14:49:59 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8bVHsBQz+CdfOjvCMzd22o3zN5ZZNWXiCnLaPCzySeg=; b=PoQvQA0I6BAUC5BNuqVNgtlN1Om5sAIqKe9n/PI8HDb6CBk9pOvmyTjuuX/TxoazVr lPA7gmRxxQUevSYbs4r2n4KSYOBoO5ZcTLAqaCZppxJ6e5hKVQOafGxXgEe7f6N9YIp1 IThc9b00632rskmVNoD5cK8z2NAvomFicD7ny4e+DNt/qHxIev9luRdKAH+77XiYQAIe Ek82GOEsRFdOoadG2l/rvbpbj90TJsMUgUAkb3Dm7PnMKrCjvMrBv2Zm/aW5n12f4GRt OGFsY+WUEWXlkLUUPG/hnlbsnBgEQkGMMVtYX/B/2VpR5mJQyyR8rjzNplQ4zuVLiwjK 1dbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8bVHsBQz+CdfOjvCMzd22o3zN5ZZNWXiCnLaPCzySeg=; b=SZXU+rqK53k3V02Ije3nEptRKrPlnP0pCr/oO2zTREJYuZmmXxHMCw6p/DxCM7e+Ec MItSaZfh0W6o+4kMmn0wWjRh80FuYZqvVnz9Kz+qwYBEWyJ7eJvIOeL3Af/pBVZBnhU8 fY68izlB89hKDTkmUmwKlkYV5OQMdI/rmHHM0/pNPIUKs3xIyEAhg9x3CsCb8z4cyuUZ QzUN1R3ISxVP5pE8+FlZPDGqdlrqP7Bus7VUwsv3ktdIN/RdTBmIKV/hT6v4oMiqjxkJ bAr9PW8HbzOkQ5DLS1BFE9W3J7tPm1Ma0CTioQtFlzKu1XGHfi/TdjY1yJ71oqf0hROF o44Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5g8HB+HZM/poK5+z4DCNvPUvf3W8wTMzUMjrfE3qBKW6KdqcF09 360hEUQt8Ob4h7t6D5kk1q4yYOsZkno+ X-Received: by 10.200.56.175 with SMTP id f44mr33556944qtc.315.1502722193636; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 07:49:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170814100956.363c7ea8@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> References: <20170813161207.GA6530@chaz.gmail.com> <20170813194939.7a96bc4b@ntlworld.com> <20170814100956.363c7ea8@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> From: Bart Schaefer Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 07:49:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: fd used for saving redirected fds leaked to child processes To: Peter Stephenson Cc: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > > We need to expose the entire hierarchy for this particular case, but > that looks like a stack or a linked list, which seems a little > heavyweight for this case. Another flag in the fdtable array?