From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 10195 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2021 21:25:11 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Apr 2021 21:25:11 -0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; t=1618176311; b=wuniMkN0Vfma8td6bdbBLJi8ZzwSOWw8hOIr4pYHt/75dKYlTl3JU4Rsz44Os5fMOG1jHag/hW y2eaYMnQe2zD+LJoxVwkifVbF/wOIGep/5Xf1qJ9q5e/ceSaDYTKx8MC1oeIunEKd3Ve1DlS2+ Xuj/txtkmeX92hJlCTYbYkDPhI+AIX7hvStS2a32vrYzPkmYfb63pFEpCdI01rxCFR8MqkZAJh 4vG9XaiNT2acsI4qcJ/niqODrxNNeHe4qFPURbW7qU1V9WQKN1xB7o0IPs+KTm08XUHy4c1q06 +dsi8JEdFKU/EYcctpA02EKv6wLSdctxnE4ENzYJ9NfLFg==; ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; zsh.org; iprev=pass (mail-oi1-f170.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.170; dkim=pass header.d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=brasslantern.com; arc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; t=1618176311; bh=5H/NLQJ14X9rLVMNnLFtC7OSWRlkjKjQYj9HrEmMXCM=; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature; b=0XY7fDwJoZu5eVX4vDmlG/J8sUpOLfNOJNfarM0rSVFEGKyUpTtrg3pylMIVCf7a8OyTKg2xFK XijARWXeMgRjzPyLzD0lFYEAEIAJKCCqW3rvsLSl1Prd1Ovzw7ZzdezWkb02MW1NwItrCaeFgy hmPDK4czIvaB1f5JlMnEGaOc4gD2Olae9pxyUTiVb9tenklK5KPCrYg+qPUpN0x0Ewu/jqA617 2ZBgQrNciEsUpteyQtSpuQ3IheZD1PDcN/ubwuCc1MQhwmWcGiWVQ3Sh4M11Aatl4qOBDw36jB UPT+g7CUokpvwtlbrJgZyGXwS0jfcPCXCLaaUA2cO5aoYQ==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID :Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=AFx9wKZpXLIFt2/DGho5i82tOcUMCwDopMeSLM8P1HE=; b=PhZIfxfoWxDLHnV52qDdJhFS/H 17Ne7d38au6KKl1i27USrTRKuspu0Ed4DDVTRJ3DYX7gms5UDuwjB5+qpb8k7hJvryBExucdPUdUI DkRF+QOPZn/+19OHqUoN+DSX6gBEDb/KwPZuREnMUHKIuekSZIiC6ByPyJzDehaJma9LEEYbiMPiT kXuVcJJ6a7ezQaNL2QFWMpOMuREZGEGxUWh/+++jd296wIt7dXo7Z1g8XmWGrIu2k57kcOaA9o3Hp jnLd3FaQglUh2N5bRcbQqZBVtYptKWZo1FEhgn5v8w0PIlJ+ie7w498FSW5Kxofm2vDMFeoDb2Wie XwanUY7w==; Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with local id 1lVhZs-0008ai-8C; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 21:25:08 +0000 Authentication-Results: zsh.org; iprev=pass (mail-oi1-f170.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.170; dkim=pass header.d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=brasslantern.com; arc=none Received: from mail-oi1-f170.google.com ([209.85.167.170]:46719) by zero.zsh.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1lVhZJ-0008KW-0M; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 21:24:34 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f170.google.com with SMTP id m13so11509785oiw.13 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:24:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AFx9wKZpXLIFt2/DGho5i82tOcUMCwDopMeSLM8P1HE=; b=FdHnrwcm4Zz+AmbyfwlXJCZ41nsd3bineUkzTLxw9Y6Yo1KYP6jNvuqDLFueF32Y5P cT8jfgyvje9WdvrYUzT46/EwVIwrhInq+Z31jRjwV0JGxQ7oETuYMUx2tX9HViC1x7v3 DuTVAwVamzfsgKTzNbwEdi5tSn6u+pC5fEh6sgc1SNuIduYQxmU+r24KnRabOweUf4h1 NaL6SLfsqIUK5Gnfeu4NdaXeJt+ps9igscM7pTpLJU1SlRvtE067dwy3Wc+YBWibmjbi ubgfUcOkILPfZgYTJcSjzi71ihGWSvRkpZCUEl2s1IFlkges2tkluAbVOt0XJzei9B7f R2lQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AFx9wKZpXLIFt2/DGho5i82tOcUMCwDopMeSLM8P1HE=; b=VH18VrzZ0KoI0jnJznJXl54DZuma2lykdvNPgWzXqY7BIZrz7gA0QM7bJEP5WC3rp4 hhKaA2dyITlKIekJ1N15/If0yil/0sJqfhyZX+3iDV4scqMj+6MYeeFbi95O2cDIDnZW MSa5SwOHeAznMOgKJ2wmln0/X3LUkljUm4scNmNIrT5ATwzDgiiAcKlSR2/WuKF4ge9M PgQkoZBOE6L+lN0S8Bp1SJgB1DwiXHQcaQP6pyZwOqh2P8ZtxzSEI+bJPetCus8Bde37 V79TyQ83HIxnjXisWPRYNltXJqxlXSC8W+97KFvFru9fjknSsLwFCpues3u1msXRQ6NA ywFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cmuWzdifztcZd+dDhaoJbCP/GQKPdxm0IwDf+leaKZrMlZ8eS VpjGIU+sok6tgDyx2O+6rfk/9V76A6i2zuFGLekxQQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySMWGrsewJ9K1duooHQYjGkRN5P8Plbz93srQ1zihCvvMbon4M1ybvwsxDGV75TqoiBKjwKLQUVYx5jIjqsqw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:341:: with SMTP id j1mr17573286oie.173.1618176271781; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:24:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210329073913.GP18178@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <20210329171120.GA6044@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <20210329181452.GB6044@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <18618-1617324651.844569@tLsN.0hLE.FeTt> <2c44b17c-407d-449e-be2e-610db313c1d7@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2c44b17c-407d-449e-be2e-610db313c1d7@www.fastmail.com> From: Bart Schaefer Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:24:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Patch bumping (was Re: Feature Patch: Use completion to view parameter values) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= Cc: Zsh hackers list , Marlon Richert Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Seq: 48508 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: With appreciation for Lawrence's efforts, I'd respectfully request that the criteria for when to send a "bump" become a matter of record. There seem to me to be these cases: 1. The patch has never been reviewed or discussed. 2. The patch was reviewed and is acceptable, but was never applied. 3. There was a discussion, but it ended without resolution. 4. The patch was referred back to the author after review or discussion. There is room for subjective interpretation of "is acceptable". A possible resolution of #2 is that the patch is rejected after all (perhaps it has become obsolete in the meantime). I mention this mostly because I think the useful elapsed time before "bumping" might be different in each case. In particular #4 seems like it could be left considerably longer, unless the patch is fixing a serious bug or security issue. Thoughts?