From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-40330-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 12090 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2017 19:37:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 40330
Received: (qmail 21733 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2017 19:37:26 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.216.181):SA:0(-0.7/5.0):. 
 Processed in 3.734839 secs); 11 Jan 2017 19:37:26 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.216.181 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=aHGgDgVG/X9c0qG50/9e1t9Ed9S5a3FESF8OL/Cm+eQ=;
        b=cu7DO053Z2o0aNHpd0OQ+xO7qUNhhfxy/zubBivy+FNfK0Wtr+bsbdO+dbmNH2iU4R
         OBnw9VqntSRNK2RpJqossIPZqLx2k+pgUsXfnJH0Z7v92w0ZrJHs6ZrnxOIyONHhE+ep
         JNPsCCsUgYJM57xMbCyeG+QIc5nsFWSQAxl8DgjppDCLuh0U3zwYxxw9KARZLrEcCPZa
         +mCKzLwWLzgu70SSkjaJolpcj7M7iyOegYrTH11KBeH4UI5lW5dSrmJ6iX/HlBAfIIIP
         xXAm+js9jTmHLXusF5PmIJ+2668LWWbpcfTZgqTe1+8VaPWxq/0eTY4IEAuU7gXhWynH
         9X5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=aHGgDgVG/X9c0qG50/9e1t9Ed9S5a3FESF8OL/Cm+eQ=;
        b=L4wYSHlGuNTr+OPLg/BawpgUCeD6mFBZYDTV3Ys6ugpR43Rg4N7ACvSSmSrGI2IQR6
         WFtyqG53a6UGMXBZp6yEMLVsqsqTe2S07uBB7XBnLeyAulE6LitUl7isi9Mh6I9JcrQl
         HOLKTzEXb+ypcxZNsg6ht1hTYFETd/NmVBrd4igcGwj4qkCCWjl3SqW+IEjbDFJu682U
         JGVyb1ikoiyuLbHsrEfP+l3G+upuZQydfdLp4MATWvzzE5iL5WvEWu+rQRZ7x4zkUPwX
         vf8VQpC2MwwcAQXP2v1y4rmWH/1OInLqxm6X2ShfPSn0EjGC+R8DKqowiZA2D6iKs5z8
         m4gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJheK5zUW3Jtjkzz3tv/kgH+Hgh+B8yIbjenW1IUZqOaamnGRkyXEec6n6k5qPrRTqKp67lMA+Q0AakHw==
X-Received: by 10.200.54.252 with SMTP id b57mr7461814qtc.113.1483926495329;
 Sun, 08 Jan 2017 17:48:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170109013526.GA25236@fujitsu.shahaf.local2>
References: <20170106172541.GA14113@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <20170109013526.GA25236@fujitsu.shahaf.local2>
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:48:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7bXzCrfbnqx8g3a6zRrtJmTuoXn97NYOD67AkACRjziuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isearch: do not use PAT_STATIC since we call zle hooks
To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to probe for this bug at runtime?  I.e., a way for
> a script to determine whether the zsh binary that interprets it has or
> hasn't this bug?

You'd need something similar to the zpty-based Test/ scripts for
completion and vicmd, because you need to invoke interactive search
with a hook function.

For this specific bug, that is.  One could probably devise by
examination of all uses of PAT_STATIC in the code base a test for the
more general case with trap handlers that I mentioned elsewhere in the
thread.