From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11356 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2015 00:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 34200 Received: (qmail 825 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2015 00:39:27 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2G3K4VHR/ZI+EwUAAt37iqZc2GxQmllhmxJl4OSa5lQ=; b=Xt6T/RKFCK8LqxwB2K5oklKh7ylgdWcu06rFUfMQL239mcbwkDDBVWBL0t0QZlmQKO pbBR0LE7p0o4tF+v5BZ6DG2E66Aat9FuKukb4nphS5e4jGGyd1Yoz4Grj5eaDfrqVHnK loffEVGuFXDDyevzGTfunpmkQp92pDK1e2ouYpvpnhkq+TsKKIr3dOs1HsR0xWiOFrkU vQq/NDvoK1i425ajW99j2khPT6RveEI67LkFodmyx4V757QDDrVJZS+ZWy+LRFXe/MP+ 8UzCfql4I4Xb2ro9DwLFkC+D0fLLNvGrHopc1V8znZO3Qgyf21W+S2VZZGL77sBT+0zx JqhA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm8P/eh3ILNt8U8kb5JF4DHQyCZHjVHf9PjrGFgaEctVJPl+hjm+XftUgMSOboyjn7AqNBN MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.200.234 with SMTP id jv10mr4450772wjc.110.1420850364213; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:39:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54B066C5.3010008@eastlink.ca> References: <1420807419-9270-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com> <54B013C5.6090307@eastlink.ca> <54B04A7A.1010402@eastlink.ca> <20150109223028.6e003bff@ntlworld.com> <54B066C5.3010008@eastlink.ca> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:39:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PATCH: hist: remove wrong NULL terminator From: Bart Schaefer To: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Ray Andrews wrote: > > Yeah, don't take it as me being bitchy Peter, it really is a question, not a > veiled comment. Except it *is* a veiled comment, because you ask how "the culture" could allow this to "pass unnoticed" as if simply by having a different attitude we could have emulated thousands of lines of code in our heads to find all possible errors (even those that have no side effects, like this one) during the years that sophisticated automatic analysis tools were simply not available except possibly to well-funded corporate teams. Right. Just a question.