From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-41452-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 22580 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2017 05:04:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 41452
Received: (qmail 14219 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2017 05:04:18 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.220.175):SA:0(-2.3/5.0):. 
 Processed in 3.484217 secs); 25 Jul 2017 05:04:18 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=PcXpEg2goKxs5AvleG5nRc6Jo3jzsp3D2Je1ZYPEIW4=;
        b=IGmGgUfW+4qkkMyoX3S1DDyQKWuvUa9RKxrmQb3n6jeRnLzDqi6CsyU0ztlnbak6Gn
         xwXMj/6OApBndSn3TkyniZtLGFK4fs1lsFctow6GnSMSCstJJK7AgsgEz86+s8fMX3UB
         Cs7jYmmCSB/R2ij9b3IZLH7A2g0kUptaiYeJzYbKkx54R+shYJEG9T3zNczrfc7qBYpb
         70fH/GQN1I6iUWGFFpm5WxUqBhn8t3lCSwPTDFH1Y4+vCIUd7T7JxKLgrDlHa61397k5
         6LQw3Yo4LTeT1udYWWyLORTFgUNRzPvz5ecK803jRUO95TbgmlbFIMA2giS4K8Qw1EGp
         Le1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=PcXpEg2goKxs5AvleG5nRc6Jo3jzsp3D2Je1ZYPEIW4=;
        b=cDZEsVIHVf9y4lhtz6WMKDd/yIMDVQmXv3bXivBgr94WcI18t53xuVKRV+ornKPd3c
         xczE2xlsxuCbCcj3OG5jMjeHKc9oNB9Nikg0IKkMfZ5fUXEFiMWUz7rEbQDoz5yXZCv2
         +I5FpOZcdPLUL8MrFMPkvLHQSDMpUgz0J9QvprAmvHxZeRuAIAqxYBe0vTkQkTl08KWB
         5yuFQjuJ5gYqwXahJQ831alG7k5qjPnKR0o3HvkliXWyu+uzaFOqZ2Xo5Akm7MXp/DTg
         KHu691yQnOEfjCkmcn23hfDeUT1qw03VZ7uKzc498spj8+F7yJNyHW/fIYVeLz+SVyrK
         V0fg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113Z1T1AJ/8Y/xQIHPrH060usZd8ZLLuihdXSrHD7j/EtAbBrS0q
	C5++8qC13FkZmyz+a0CZVXLXgbexsOR1
X-Received: by 10.55.7.139 with SMTP id 133mr22134270qkh.165.1500959048493;
 Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <etPan.59769e28.2447d90.188@zdharma.org>
References: <etPan.5970cf0e.4c5f2547.6b4@zdharma.org> <etPan.5970eb83.495b9d04.6b4@AirmailxGenerated.am>
 <etPan.59769e28.2447d90.188@zdharma.org>
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:04:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7bsXtfucwrjOga8VNWU5hHwtu7eaLRuYiw3wZE+NLDnxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Can ZWC be optimized, for lesser depths of recursive exec* calls?
To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Sebastian Gniazdowski
<psprint@zdharma.org> wrote:
>
> It's just that I suspect "recurse and forget" tactics in exec.c.

I don't know what you mean by this.