From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: zsh-workers-return-43549-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 21ff3206
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:16:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 13688 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2018 17:15:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 43549
Received: (qmail 13668 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Sep 2018 17:15:58 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.167.51):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. 
 Processed in 3.462807 secs); 25 Sep 2018 17:15:58 -0000
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=2cR5tf9k4v28QCgZrTLcXrpDzM4jtpD7o7/keAeUZyg=;
        b=Y3ZbFcc5r5yXtdbV5QgW2+ZWbbefQhodtevjSQeZCa6iByWS1bBCt6GAfr49f3n6qo
         2i1LJu3MTtZ93oJLxEzdF3+7zSsxMO9VG7Uzvkh9BERRqt2xDuzVv02tH3MpP3eVSID7
         AiKtlMTxcPUviX7uXpR9sl1Qud1X441qT4Zwpy/fgX3lmF897AY36F5TsbZhQpBpg/SC
         hepwjYW+aKlPMZ/gII4zNFbZDV9obgb0VEaJH80u54TWS9ak09nn3VWBGeXoE1g1Qkmm
         NS3R66d+hqIHCUHAGJYSh7+r9uaGqhQUst6mvfdYuEKpffrbuu6HsGT+8Q3KtY4HnUd5
         aQAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=2cR5tf9k4v28QCgZrTLcXrpDzM4jtpD7o7/keAeUZyg=;
        b=LcipoAp8SUjqFG4IV7Cs4+idQm37pW7GNSeyvFEKib14cNTzu6caGv9N81SWS4YJ2X
         79mkN8q+3IgTL2fcpnE1O97Hu1O+d5Ubh06OHpfVaRFyFBBkGZ48vF3g3gZxjXg6XdRj
         rHW8nAPM1P8OjJFEOO/EetUdjMiz4Di3W70/FgfW354K6cYMsUWR6BSkBAHSNXAE3iR/
         zn9wbydTl8c3pCBOzNgDxvBYIt2ylPvpdUn0tp80UDoyhLMLTkb4AqIb6Z/PtGOHGNoG
         FLLFOwc9QT2GR7xJqskM69Oy8Uyi2XNzlrqtea5t6nSPk9tOvovjctW0cUlzhSGqmGum
         YETw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohBi7HEfszhevsSyoIaqzQA3Mii6KI0qrZvg+BMXB2kZ/zjihH9
	uKZJiBZlh6eAjdjmEjzBXpDSqWI+pWM62ukzsP4YjcT6+w8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61R+g3zvLnUZGUlXoePB3kwCtUAnzdoCOdlgn1bIFl0YgJqQbq7tGxbTohBqLXtr30K2EOImO3/cZRtVt2lavQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:53c5:: with SMTP id h66-v6mr1595606lfl.9.1537895749166;
 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1537893781.3440282.1520248648.5C05E858@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <AM0P195MB03370F6E436A8BA5D4ECE09D84170@AM0P195MB0337.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <1537805063.1343776.1518857576.402E4300@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <20180924180000.m257nywzw3os6fwh@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <97867-1537836417.607408@ncg4.-zqh.qDGo>
 <1537893781.3440282.1520248648.5C05E858@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:15:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7bzZB-zW0v9EX=BVX=eKeMSXyZj0ZTRnB=uzY4rJTOcug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] git checkout completion shows duplicated branch names
To: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
Cc: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Oliver Kiddle wrote on Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:46 +0200:
>> They might have different matching control rules.
>
> The *display* strings don't affect matching control rules, do they?

I think not, but display strings do affect the use of list-colors.