From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-30308-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10154 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2012 16:20:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 30308
Received: (qmail 15370 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2012 16:20:09 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 4wayned@gmail.com designates 10.152.132.130 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.152.132.130;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 4wayned@gmail.com designates 10.152.132.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=4wayned@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=4wayned@gmail.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=4qasee5C8zXdyw047iLB6GopvhqtfnraAv3Bmr5Wn/Q=;
        b=FuxIiuWjkNNX6P6RxFOaCt4bc6VRCeZNDiz3zqTv8wCeZQBStT2JMb6zj7784Ym6kA
         Lda7W38d/8PAakONesmO7uwPDIItV6bN9vDkl0NY87RrBQr8jRcRaYMH6CpdFbW3oyZT
         kvQLWm07cPJEHzYzUGjHl8DCiSnySU5BeA8No=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: 4wayned@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20120301143046.49093711@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
References: <20120227162251.GA17559@zaphod.q-ix.net>
	<CAHYJk3SwmPTq0pNd2qa88kZV0beai9UjsyHeJK0Wh5csgm4=eg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHYJk3Skfz7xQcGv=r5t+-MQ_YCv0CGsmhK3k-9GnCwuV09-Uw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHYJk3TtwY7eUXRrB9DfoAva+LUoFTnyi4wVNBqR2WvB7NG=PQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120227173523.2941f24d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<20120301143046.49093711@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:20:01 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mVloptmQgtefEzLQWGV1T5YiB4s
Message-ID: <CAHSx_Sv5tZDWET8YVqc6DmwAkGhy0EvdnT6AQxhJa_AckZiyvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Integer overflow during brace expansion
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043089b4032e3904ba30d592

--f46d043089b4032e3904ba30d592
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Peter Stephenson
<Peter.Stephenson@csr.com>wrote:

> +   long long foo = (long long)400;
> +   char buf[20];
> +   sprintf(buf, "before%lldafter", foo);
> +   if (!strcmp(buf, "before400after")) {
>

I think it'd be nice to get some higher bits involved in that check.
 Perhaps something like this:

    long long foo = ((long long)0xdead << 40) | 0xf00d;

compares to before62677660341432333after (and needs a larger buf).

..wayne..

--f46d043089b4032e3904ba30d592--