From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29584-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 27018 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2011 11:58:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29584
Received: (qmail 27142 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2011 11:58:25 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=KQQ9X2rdQPGEgTSRh2CCdnxho5p93TcsX0lzDGeTg/4=;
        b=upkNxU6gwC2RUVsjai7pARHQ08g+OdaYi1xrH047DH3c/0//ZF8dca+tTZ9PNyka1P
         6HzfsWCB/nZWalW6SK+CuvNjJp13ytByOyk2EvXO+H4IJ8g1isiUJNBKB9ntEnVh5Rv+
         tt0wZMkgRtwUDBtX7cTPW97X9bIg4nSymW0Jg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADdV=MuyRfW57ZizZxw3aw_Q0sRf2YRE1qHOewrSQMtZKoZLWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADdV=MuyRfW57ZizZxw3aw_Q0sRf2YRE1qHOewrSQMtZKoZLWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:58:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3Q4WFj64ccJdxBHEO3t18zMgz9C6pGhBe6BjDNamf64+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Git commands or aliases first?
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se>
Cc: Zsh Workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 22 July 2011 13:40, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What is the desired tag order for Git commands and aliases?
>
> My conclusion is that the current behavior is incorrect.  My reasoning
> is that git will prefer invoking a command over an alias with the same
> name.
>
> Does anyone have a contradictory opinion, or should I merge this change?

We could show aliases first, but leave out ones that are also
commands? On the one hand, I would want to complete my aliases before
the commands, on the other hand I usually make alias names short
enough to not need completing. On the third hand it's configurable
with group-order anyway, so either is fine with me :). Ie
zstyle ':completion:*:git:*' group-order main-porcelain-commands

-- 
Mikael Magnusson