From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4727 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2014 07:57:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33589 Received: (qmail 27984 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2014 07:57:17 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gS0fNeWSZxKEDSQ46rndeNRrdX5wgLQVpr3Rjxqe0O0=; b=nBV6BqP3yU/RdEcj5W5JXyhEmvpOpqIZdbmPz3Ef8fjdOFxMMia4nYuNEoMvIqifCz FGPu4Bv8cPZVknWgok4g2C5PNB6GEXJsWG2n9TdNxTZa6qljT1rbCRiPB2jFyK6YXCp6 aTNPbca+UZ2SVuf/gC3zXJompQlIhTue4xHRzlqfSCD2THaunMIxybgeh4cyh5MkA/t2 yyeckLtUdaIeuQJ0pyqGULLIbB1icKGV14QmnXN3lQjCjdttYlS+OD48ortediSq87vf t6jJUcByn1feFZGtAgAKlEG5loYD4KyjArihqs/h4liWuorutt4Af+T+N7KvU6zrUNbt 7row== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.38.136 with SMTP id m130mr59687iom.72.1414828633372; Sat, 01 Nov 2014 00:57:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8123AE4B-66A3-4789-B0A3-5E5C26DB986D@freebsd.org> References: <8123AE4B-66A3-4789-B0A3-5E5C26DB986D@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 08:57:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MacOS X patches From: Mikael Magnusson To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: zsh workers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > FWIW, I noticed that Apple has some patches for zsh-5.0.5 available here: > > http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/zsh/zsh-61/patches/ > > The changes are rather minor, but perhaps there=E2=80=99s something you m= ay want to take. > > Regards, > > Pedro. > > ps. IANAL but I don=E2=80=99t see nay license disclaimer that could prohi= bit taking them. I wonder what they have against the calendar system documentation. The only "interesting" patch I can see is the utmpx one, but all the other ones are mostly pointless. I'm not exactly sure what the arg_zero patch does though. (One wonders why they want to modify the install-strip target instead of just calling the install target). On a side note and to save us answering the same problems over and over in #zsh, I wish they would drop this too, http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/zsh/zsh-61/zshenv --=20 Mikael Magnusson