From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23824 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2015 19:01:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36303 Received: (qmail 12533 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2015 19:01:00 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/IOE+VVFeptGv559Al+1B06GgUs+WI/77kIdJg2rIsg=; b=AUNAwVa+yzXh+PG0A0rCQL3Zka1w7Pdk6nzpzBH1Usa1VhQJuSTv39RyCGl3aHTYqi JBzxKDh9WgBPRI/FnqHRJdGFAewJVdSdIueTmqbWH5TtQWBq+jpF1GBSX9+yh7+8ABXx bKntr9ZXxBe0rxV4yK1yzowf4Ei3IbBHlvYuhE+p04ieg8OhmlrzNaNt4dgBUyfVSEc4 BVDprWtzzXCV8oKocY9RA1ygj1Npe+zgqkZBFcKgCs7lhBino4CDRzRJSEmBeyO4j3RU oPVq82GX2tEbsCG3ON+vaWqOZtiQ3w+LR0ymACjQP8krKv+ryt3SCiH98uTNF5GOiNKb buow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.221.8 with SMTP id n8mr9579378qki.85.1440702058779; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:00:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150826053928.GD19027@tarsus.local2> <150826111808.ZM30185@torch.brasslantern.com> <150826213532.ZM31157@torch.brasslantern.com> <150826214729.ZM12037@torch.brasslantern.com> <150826221413.ZM25355@torch.brasslantern.com> <150827094724.ZM1120@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 21:00:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Completion of prefix redirections is -command- instead of -redirect- From: Mikael Magnusson To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh workers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Mikael Magnusson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Bart Schaefer > wrote: >> On Aug 27, 8:22am, Mikael Magnusson wrote: >> } Subject: Re: Completion of prefix redirections is -command- instead of -re >> } >> } When I try this patch, I get all my previous cases right except the >> } one you mentioned, but also >> } ; < : >> } completes files instead of commands now (before, it completed commands >> } both with and without the : there, so not more correct in total). >> >> It thinks ":" IS the command. > > Hmm, indeed, I'm not sure what I was thinking there, my context is > long gone. It is possible that I meant to say "commands instead of > files", which is what happens when I test it now. Ignore the last part of this, I had the final patch reverted for testing earlier and apparently upgraded libcap after that and the subsequent reinstall failed, or something. It works correctly now. -- Mikael Magnusson