From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: (qmail 2546 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2020 17:38:46 -0000
Received: from ns1.primenet.com.au (HELO primenet.com.au) (203.24.36.2)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with UTF8ESMTPZ; 27 Apr 2020 17:38:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 12751 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2020 17:38:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 45726
Received: (qmail 17905 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Apr 2020 17:38:37 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-io1-f66.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <mikachu@gmail.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.102.2/25793. spamassassin: 3.4.4.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.166.66):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.3509 secs); 27 Apr 2020 17:38:37 -0000
X-Envelope-From: mikachu@gmail.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.166.66 as permitted sender)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=jTOxMX7hdp3coBmNOYzBow/v9p+z2l2IMw7uqb6PgSs=;
        b=dmfvhSfTSWvo2+gUGfdp/q+2tAiT8xbWx4yq1XcLf2llDvkVUPI9kI7nnzF+XSqLxH
         IvwX58G/N4oEP4z9W8xFvXdg+OIJBBlx5utc2pkqcEWvY4t1TR88zRr4bvr4ynWnIb3E
         5aUocMTGHNz3Cr3W3JRQ5PXsyuXb79iIWO2AHEJybQX0+TfCTB5+t0W7VyV36Dr+3NJr
         TvYaSDRkjeuIosQN+V+CIKnzeBhLm12Kcn47TFaND9PtRUdLPMys5kSBWV2Yfi8q2ruK
         ymUK5PLYppis5eNDiZQ2QFDStH5KqGdOTM5YP6nCH6ElYuNob7kVZC8ITh06zFDdRSfD
         XLhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaXEiiWLB56JLlysc15cxm0RxBz/8hwmuGaP/dVvLrN5paFViSP
	04rr/6/xT88IUFbMDMLsdjHmO3hOPT5M21M6gEBd8g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK6OA4j1wI6brvhdu4yKrwO7MPZ3yc8s3eeH5uazwaxTTr6d5LzbNpjzt7YXNvuAVxzEJAelWccO2/UO1C1OqY=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cbba:: with SMTP id v26mr20670534jap.14.1588009082776;
 Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAN=4vMpWqnb+uVjXdPa9E+c4kLMPt4z0gaScPeYthHuA1m4EMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200427101430.447e2a21@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <CAN=4vMpWqnb+uVjXdPa9E+c4kLMPt4z0gaScPeYthHuA1m4EMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:38:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3QXhdG+yjOCiLnABkXnu09Q3wN_B3ThaHWVoXkk3r9igg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zstyle: "more specific" patterns and *-components
To: Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On 4/27/20, Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:15 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
> wrote:
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> My reading of the documentation matches yours, so I also expected the
> behavior you expected (which isn't the actual behavior). I also find
> the documented behavior preferable to the actual behavior.
>
> My experience with zstyle is minuscule, so appraising my opinion at 2
> cents would be too generous.

Another view is that in both cases you specified the values of two
'elements', the fact that they are adjacent in one case shouldn't (one
could argue) affect the specificity of the pattern. (this isn't
necessarily my view).

-- 
Mikael Magnusson