From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33849-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 1066 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2014 07:35:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33849
Received: (qmail 2716 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2014 07:35:29 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=CcbyOGuFG0Oz2DDaRHCkWjPGSutBT9krXGh6dYGngas=;
        b=fhbTX2ki42f7Jk6m+o+JYDo83adm699fsB4AlxbLp2eJmlEqdbyH3lxdwh0SqjggPg
         dEWRnBRPG2rRIkd9vXY9GjaMB+XqB2W9c8JaWAHHGmhY7ALFIgXuSv7eT1pYzOrMWyyM
         uQSOu/ttfwuJ3RBWAB1/bHEJzt7e4Wn4wYNDX2+ijWwzQfkoe8X9jxIcW4ao7YgayubO
         pUKLDWISphEdNpknmy92Qk3uWKRGPa1pMsTDknuIC/Rucqvztz+Kj9voxyj0RlyRIQfC
         rQD9pH+Jd4JsFfE/LCdMki/BpQNaAE/Y7i1Fv8OKmhQYKsfTU17iMSOQymgN48ZPXbb4
         4Zxg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.152.13 with SMTP id a13mr13802135ioe.1.1417764923390;
 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:35:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <141204231735.ZM9532@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <17052.1417717710@thecus.kiddle.eu>
	<141204231735.ZM9532@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 08:35:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3RWFNPyCLCsQVPjFbHrBffCCAw-ckt3k+t4V_686N2mqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: default vi-mode key bindings
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4,  7:28pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> }
> } The undo bindings are a change to existing behaviour.
> } I think it is better that someone has to explicitly select the
> } vi-compatible single level undo/redo toggling and that the default is
> } multi-level undo with redo on Ctrl-R. Ctrl-R is currently redisplay.
>
> I will bow to the majority opinion on this because I rarely use vi-mode
> in zsh, but I will say that I have lost more work to vim's multi-level
> undo than to practically any other catastrophe I can think of.

If you accidentally undo a bunch of stuff, and then type something in
vim, you can use :undolist to bring up the discarded redo history, and
jump between various redo/undo tree branches (extremely confusing, but
probably easier than grepping /dev/mem).

-- 
Mikael Magnusson