From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4148 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2013 21:10:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31321 Received: (qmail 18753 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2013 21:09:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.210.179 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Erq5CA/3GsRreTdwkCsxakrEJgyN+BqoLixs5rqozh8=; b=wiamLK6GRN5VAnQwIf7G9X4e69m0sMrqxTnGaVB4HDHsDKB0gZaMIH45Mye0hX3uYD slIjiPnzgNXZt4Ea6yc5k+5TuUFWWxyeT9YTbZ2q1I0Q8zj8tbNeXmoLB4Xwc4xm51CK p+o0QcAXISynJ84IRBUF7bO7eHMtTUxD7AShmDTThPiy7zY8DRiDklCQp4avLMXxil63 k5mxxKkZ9rIUA02SY48R4/0QlRMBFOz5I6dZT7RGx9/qPEhHNRRgMSvwMA+BFgJO7xiR nOwEHZi1c5E/bnS3t136CZYelHh3GO5V3I+5K2uDQxEaoMvRtmvLIVdMopGP4MIOHfaq Pnmw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.79.201 with SMTP id l9mr13185594igx.79.1366578591272; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:09:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <130420232740.ZM12405@torch.brasslantern.com> <130421112734.ZM6597@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:09:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Alignment issue with multiple describes From: Mikael Magnusson To: Felipe Contreras Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 21/04/2013, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > It doesn't matter how it's done, as long as the bug is fixed. > >> [*] Unfortunately the person most familiar with this code has not been >> active in zsh development for 12 years. On the other hand, it's been >> 12 years and you're the first person ever to notice/mention this, so it >> probably doesn't affect anyone's usage of the shell. > > It probably does, but nobody cares enough about subtle bugs in zsh. > Specially since most completions don't use more than one _description, > the git completion being one exception. > > Anyway, I'm going to label this as a bug the zsh developers are > unwilling to fix, and I'm going to work around it by avoiding more > than one _description with actual descriptions. > > And BTW, the fact that you have part of the code nobody understands, > has touched, or is willing to touch in a decade should be a concern to > you. And so should be the decreasing year-over-year contributions and > commits: > > https://www.ohloh.net/p/zsh/commits/summary > > I would say this is a sign that you should reconsider your development > practices. But whatever, keep going the way you are going if you want. Would appreciate if you stop trolling. -- Mikael Magnusson