From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17139 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2011 07:53:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29680 Received: (qmail 9782 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2011 07:53:02 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8FMICLiemKl4n5q/yofk9nHHnC2RbjIm4XqzcYSmKOE=; b=Vd9r+Ezs5ekC8ZRAMxEaIDk0VJOla2t4FaVppuQTL/WPF3tpuNI5BeHeDqWEjnxZHt OMWm31Wdv9xz9L9hY+mHZRS0xkxkgTR6ZlkCwD/Cu2YGWanDYBW3hjLmgmG62FuBe+04 vxUOrda+qF3uVI3Cno7dKDZIibQRHdTYVQutc= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1306459987-18807-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com> <110526214445.ZM533@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:52:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PATCH: clarify which quotation marks to note From: Mikael Magnusson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 27 May 2011 07:14, Mikael Magnusson wrote: > On 27 May 2011 06:44, Bart Schaefer wrote: >> On May 27, 3:33am, Mikael Magnusson wrote: >> } Subject: PATCH: clarify which quotation marks to note >> } >> } I found the "Note the quotation marks" remark a bit confusing when I >> } read this. >> >> I still find it confusing. :-} >> >> } the expression `tt(*(e:'reply=(${REPLY}{1,2})':))' will cause the words >> } +`tt(lonely1)' and `tt(lonely2)' to be inserted into the command line. Note >> } +the quotation marks in the expression. >> >> Note the single quotes inside the colons in the expression. >> >> Perhaps?? > > Maybe we could say "The var(string) is quoted as noted above", > referring to this earlier sentence > > Note that expansions must be quoted in the var(string) > to prevent them from being expanded before globbing is done. > > Which is not incorrect, but you need to quote other things too, > *(e:):) is an error for example (a different error than *(e:\):) ). > > It's weird how long you can stare at some stupid little thing and not > come up with a good concise way to write it down. Okay, how about simply "note the quoting of var(string)"? -- Mikael Magnusson