From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35213-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 8074 invoked by alias); 19 May 2015 06:34:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35213
Received: (qmail 17276 invoked from network); 19 May 2015 06:34:04 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=RxCUUs/kNEV6lABxqmauzNGv62CdxWOnLO43Ia6KKvM=;
        b=pPc+1xtKTt7dH/SQQ5zOKW5Kks4fE1sjHwAB0961gm5xM4PNM1MJEGIiGL2ZOzx8ZI
         +hkIJ3oCY+2Ec7oBP/vN+4V04E+o9djun/E9eP4vlnc+I6YZH0Qlk709sfkvqX0Qiht4
         oIaY/YaaId1iei7shvbtFwqFd58pztBXEjl4rZdirblBNLoWkqA/KceFdBW5BIAYh5TC
         M4yoHdWMvA/W97S+sNE99BQSHkF36D23j2mXUhM4F4jyd2pOyiM5dKXsOaox+tSIW5cv
         X1ecQTuR/0bpphFmYhTq1k5un4ebYzMdjx1kkJYc1WhadNC9qHct49WoXhi/KLUCEcLp
         WY6g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.151.83 with SMTP id kr19mr38795866icc.3.1432017241953;
 Mon, 18 May 2015 23:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150518173034.ZM2314@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <CAJ1KOAh9_WHM9WS_NKXFy9Dhqrsupi+xT36euHLq9iaWaZ_oig@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150518115301.0c80918d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<CAJ1KOAhWcNN-F7jXgo0vCc+ioR2d09_f1Np9EWf0TS+rZ-fkkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150518124039.0160a3bb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<150518173034.ZM2314@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:34:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3SHgHMBMv1GiYX5FCEw76dm+2zijRoKV9Rizb9TS9fchA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: vim completion problem after workers/35168
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Bart Schaefer
<schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On May 18, 12:40pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> } Subject: Re: vim completion problem after workers/35168
> }
> } On Mon, 18 May 2015 14:22:20 +0300
> } Ismail Donmez <ismail@donmez.ws> wrote:
> } > _vim:7: parse error near `)'
> }
> } Yet another annoyance: in the old hack, you got away with having a
> } pattern beginning with "(" (and containing balanced parentheses)
> } followed by an unbalanced ")".  Now you don't.
>
> Hrm.  Zsh patterns include "(this|that)", and "case" syntax includes
> "pattern)" without an open paren, so ...?
>
> The "old hack" is one of those "well, it really should have been done
> differently in the first place, but it wasn't, so now what?" issues
> that bug me because *somebody* is going to get bitten in the way _vim
> just was.

I agree, there are other places in the distributed functions that are
currently broken by this change, and at least one in my own set of
functions. We can't just break backwards compat like this.

-- 
Mikael Magnusson