From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15103 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2015 11:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 34137 Received: (qmail 13914 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2015 11:24:50 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vIDV/2b6bQFv6/VPVEeTUu/QlLcSzrZrtA1r94dsljI=; b=SJKZuluN4WegX/SdRfHasXiuT6FyF/59ycYAyU3ec9bBI1mVToWkOCd8zAe3nvN+2c 2EeW1L7Q59eIwZTd7eCyfLaSisaJ+w+E5OL3VG5ipUl2DpoEdpK/tMxSpJIhpQsc3o61 ZLtfk8zPxg5oA6KvZx1IZkwOhUg4DpfB/5eKYWoK+ggAqqwL4+gr2BvVd4EgYJybYXAM JfPOZytHGn7hiofrFdFV2bsSo0yIXXLHm3BFLT8D8j7v7bw73azAIrqY+t/UaUX7htNh 5vmeNx9wkfVOFnyaTlSHn5uCpOgZhdBwFyR8NuIQ8mzSTFtxCvYWBf9dKjgnKsPgB3EV gm7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.38.9 with SMTP id a9mr38781397ice.68.1420543489868; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 03:24:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150106111802.0f0f7289@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> References: <1420521949-30483-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com> <1420521949-30483-14-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com> <20150106095449.081ed9a5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150106103437.7cde520a@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150106111802.0f0f7289@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 12:24:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PATCH 13/17: anon funcs: don't leak shf when ctrl-c in () {:} =(sleep 1) From: Mikael Magnusson To: Peter Stephenson Cc: zsh workers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 12:06:32 +0100 > Mikael Magnusson wrote: >> And I suppose I'll leave this for an even colder winter day. Or we >> could point potential new contributors looking for areas to help to >> this code, as an introductory exercise to set their expectations >> right. > > There's an essay in frustration waiting to come out of that... > > Maybe we could *not* point potential new contributors at the current > code and they could just do it right this time...? Maybe in D? Haha, yes, that might be a better idea. (I hope it was somewhat obvious that I was kidding too, I'm not quite _that_ evil). -- Mikael Magnusson