From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9227 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2015 17:52:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 35576 Received: (qmail 7836 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2015 17:52:04 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kbJvWGFinQlQUxSsIVZCl/sJe/yZROcqhp8hqUTszok=; b=db0qe3SbkDeHFrnMnZtCFzEdlnLPpe8j+4JY4K8wm/II0MXIGrjngDFtgmJmxMs0m6 +Md0qV9s8XgRZTOjklpdXqwO9T1kN+YpvfRVTiY+pilbw3CARYlaw/UrWFijyFNrfOC4 0KVVlGUQWzBkS1nDrXHz2lHQLs8SQ+NTjKX6q4rLleg2CuDy10rUWWDXMJRIhrLQ6B+8 pTDhiIncC40P5DTaLdijRy3E6XNNtMdmwZWYxVwReM0bMuL9+/KKl25pqI2kSSbSWyXH KBdTUlJW+sQzNLMHImoyj4I4mu20DwxnT+16S/61q6DcsUpuKCgsE+LDUZi+LVgUh2BF +X5A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.163.146 with SMTP id m140mr48100823ioe.85.1435081921655; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:52:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150623174719.43eaa1e2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> References: <5578996E.3080700@thequod.de> <150610191427.ZM30841@torch.brasslantern.com> <5579C247.1060800@thequod.de> <150611183639.ZM32247@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150612094237.338f79d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150619123930.2688d9e3@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150621210512.113577a6@ntlworld.com> <20150621213842.621886e0@ntlworld.com> <20150623174719.43eaa1e2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 19:52:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Typeset with array From: Mikael Magnusson To: Peter Stephenson Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > Some more tests and one quite subtle fix. > > I think this is now basically working. Any more comments, or should I > roll this out and see what happens? I tried it and didn't encounter any problems so far (amazing, right?). This isn't really related to this series, but I noticed it now for the first time; what's the deal with the space at the end of associative arrays in typeset -p output? % typeset -a a=(b); typeset -A b=(b c); typeset -p a b typeset -a a a=(b) typeset -A b b=(b c ) -- Mikael Magnusson