From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36287-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 18540 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2015 04:55:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36287
Received: (qmail 26590 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2015 04:55:01 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=+pweT+k0n467gaeczTtX+HOp0IUZXWp+RXGrKJg9Evo=;
        b=azBIM83HIROs/MKJ+SaFRdJLGLSvnfzB+5+jwM01k4wKVJdwsXF4XsS8F8HGRTTa+/
         yrvJfHWKB0dfAP4nbDDhxnomuBi5SOMopEd1ssS4tAqOqtNCZJZBw2WdC6VcoIYNOLYY
         5/TUDWtUtON5YEdESu33XCR2lcleEDarFD+vmCqycKiSy1WX4CMAIN2Yf42QOhLr9JNF
         zKA1miejpyWGsC1Raa+IPqbfvjJUDKZxLGGNta7MkgkLcQC+viMsZAuJrj/fMDUHYYbD
         wlhXe9OZWiolGbKc7ekDZkTQvkUInl4YFumntb+ZlLLjDUHBk/524frzj8Ah3sDgU0TL
         7HrQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.233.7 with SMTP id e7mr3557061qhc.79.1440651297115; Wed,
 26 Aug 2015 21:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150826214729.ZM12037@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <20150826053928.GD19027@tarsus.local2>
	<150826111808.ZM30185@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<CAHYJk3S-T6kyx5v7ARo8MP8O7D57ig=eKoXyi2Cr4b+=3W0B3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<150826213532.ZM31157@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<150826214729.ZM12037@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:54:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3TT8A1Lqu6gv0JRxxACwCOigYSsF+3CwBHNd_UdT8B5NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Completion of prefix redirections is -command- instead of -redirect-
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Bart Schaefer
<schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Aug 26,  9:35pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> }
> } Does this do it?
>
> To answer my own question, no, it doesn't ... or at least not entirely.
>
> Both WITH and WITHOUT the change in 36285, completing after this:
>
> % ls < ;
>
> completes files rather than commands.  I suppose if you've botched the
> syntax you have no right to expect sanity, and the foregoing hasn't
> changed since 5.0.7, so we're no worse off.

Yeah, it's better than either with or without the 36285 patch, but
still doesn't handle all cases,

< <tab> gives files (correct)
; <tab> gives commands (correct)
< ; <tab> gives commands (correct)
foo < ; <tab> gives files (wrong-ish)
; < <tab> gives commands (wrong)
foo=bar; < <tab> gives commands (wrong, presumably same case as the above)
; < : <tab> gives commands (correct)
; < : : <tab> gives files (correct)

Is there any reason we can't just reset state to 'this is a new
command' when we see an unquoted solo semicolon? Or is determining
that this is the case in fact the trouble?

-- 
Mikael Magnusson