From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7114 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2015 06:12:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 35914 Received: (qmail 11016 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2015 06:12:40 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PeSfY3QzxRDrWUtCs1tg70e5dAq5OcBMQtnmyvYstRM=; b=el4Ty0Fww8bMhcthpzfhhL9T3Te22coGaDhZ4uydeWS28yOnUEyBHGqQRAQf42MJB8 UY4REVXYV1llMCIIG9IZr4s4i3bQx2kRF+vImy2PMc1bwm9jR0032VrjbTuYVFQMVcL/ 94CFL+08B4GkWn+8Ubt3ClGh/2io06p9ncEojKfEaSY3v45DDPxd78hKWEosyNnMIMIy ot9VFmI7d1HU4EF0fgSU9n1jQPrSoRTgT2wS1mL2U/2VgPH76tQ1kmvO0EEr3aWn3vtf r3UkBrWfCox9dGwOm/baguYXdTfgsP4XZCKW5h1COdA5q8AWxCOI+KNH2/YPNLRevnv1 xfMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.4.102 with SMTP id j6mr8402884igj.40.1437891157939; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 23:12:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <150725154637.ZM3294@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <150725154637.ZM3294@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 08:12:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: I almost hate to ask this, but: Version 5.0.9? From: Mikael Magnusson To: zsh workers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > I know it hasn't been that long since 5.0.8 but we've fixed a bunch of crash > bugs and deadlocks. Heck, the "case" wordcode problem is probably bad enough > by itself to warrant a new release. > > There are a few of Oliver's patches, including those during the sourceforge > outage, that haven't been pushed yet, but otherwise the most significant > thing I can recall that hasn't been addressed is the probable POSIX getopts > incompatibility. > > Counter-point would be that the new typeset behavior hasn't been in the wild > for very long. I would say wait at least a few days for the $(( )) stuff? Those patches looked a bit scary. And is the undo limit stuff sorted out? (I haven't gotten around to actually testing git myself in a bit, just looking over threads). Other than that, I can't think of anything. -- Mikael Magnusson