From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36360-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 9711 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2015 06:51:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36360
Received: (qmail 22087 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2015 06:51:00 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=ZoEb7nV5UqixdCwyR9CQLOnQtgx9P1fi6JKSjihZudQ=;
        b=B1mxt5SDW4yL19aH1pqgxRM/PkRvmunh1LobPUFXJQS5NzVbtvhqjDuwHMnS0nRxqX
         ZlTEq3R5fMGzZTp1YfHMB9QECiIbAT1cNNdlQwSdc6/533qMFRC6pEyA9qgoE+TUhLzf
         jp3fsPAK9xoBCg3VjFGSbmpfXXO6GaFxa9jjbiPY2fh/aTh4Fdng8RaTbJ33iRGYHSoj
         I4vJCQlU/YCGNQWDeGA5XOAXN1tDDCYua4/zHbWTZxPC1WdPUpYe9R7n9tZ5+RukMP+m
         HHt8qyb2Fjl22nqZPYd5lqHMem4RaXRH0jcnGWpTXwJG0FB3nkfF2sk77HmjU5INZh40
         d5sQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.221.79 with SMTP id n76mr15362182qki.62.1441090254102;
 Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150831232311.ZM921@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <101231002820.ZM7583@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<1441007642-12365-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com>
	<20150831181101.32f43e65@ntlworld.com>
	<150831232311.ZM921@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:50:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3TwtNAQnP9W3R=jDOUMQLobg_9V7Sfd-3Qx+T8zsL5NZg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Implement zle -P
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Aug 31,  6:11pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> } Subject: Re: PATCH: Implement zle -P
> }
> } On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:54:02 +0200
> } Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
> } > This lets you say
> } > % zle -P mywidget prototypewidget myfunction
> } > and it will work like zle -N mywidget myfunction except it will behave
> } > like prototypewidget in Various Ways0x2122.
> }
> } It's not entirely clear what this does without documentation, but as the
> } flags are a bit obcsure anyway, it might not be all that clear how to
> } document it, either.
>
> I presume this is exactly like "zle -C name widget function" except that
> "widget" doesn't have to be a completion widget and "function" defaults
> to being the same as "name".
>
> Presumably the idea is for wrapper widgets, e.g., something like this:
>
>     zle -P bracketed-paste-magic bracketed-paste
>
> which would then make b-p-magic behave exactly like b-p, and thereby,
> e.g., eliminate the need for this stuff at the end of the former:
>
>     # Arrange to display highlighting if necessary
>     if [[ -n ${(M)zle_highlight:#paste:*} ]]; then
>         zle -R
>         zle .read-command && zle -U - $KEYS
>     fi
>
> If that's NOT what it accomplishes, then I'm uncertain why it's needed
> at all.

Well, it was your idea in the first place. And yeah, I made a mess of
these threads, there's an example for the above in the latest mail.

-- 
Mikael Magnusson