From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24172 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2013 06:42:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31081 Received: (qmail 18949 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2013 06:42:39 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.128.46 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EbodIBZkjdDBk2G0g7af2GEf55npGRyqhLMSxm4Db0E=; b=Vv4mPpg7MznMD43/qJnghB8E0zVWMS3jpQNdFD4FioWt/2d4Pu4pr8cpymOp6GSTmA Sb1kCJ8TUcNUv1Ozcw7Q+oeWQNsiN6+2jlWo6A596WBI1PF10BNhARBdaHWiRn7BaOT+ IJBRBRdcocfcdVj5l0GKA56jxNegxAKceDbEmWJC58EFFuMBYarLQb0kjMjbPHciDedH Y9h6dHz6D43Pz4Mgm/cLrKBw8jDAc+gR9/V30TwwMm7uWJijuk0rRtxjCw47H2HFGXpz 66eKyCYjGYB9Nekm0nC3C6clQkVGClTJuTPc9WgIoz6qUWx+xAPNnatvSIAOTKBxFUm6 BS2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.120.225 with SMTP id lf1mr8896894qeb.14.1362033752627; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:42:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:42:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zsh completer _approximate completer From: joe M To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, For some reason, changing the group-order of this zstyle put the original before the corrections in the _appropriate completer. zstyle ':completion:*' group-order original 'named-directories' 'directory-stack' 'local-directories' 'path-directories' > zstyle ':completion:*:approximate:*' group-order original corrections Shouldn't this be the better or more accurate method of specifying group-order for the _approximate completer instead? Thanks Joe