From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c1fe4941 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25085 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2019 19:13:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 44516 Received: (qmail 20289 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Jul 2019 19:13:36 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua1-f45.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.101.2/25503. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.222.45):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 2.122372 secs); 12 Jul 2019 19:13:36 -0000 X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.222.45 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ls7u9S1OjhoHGdDMGwVWAZ7jLZpiNyFhjI3hwocaQ4w=; b=fZrm/OszGDR36O04tqzj5mTDd/LfW4cp9B65CaYrMY8J06CMOa4fhfns3g5oDMwpf+ pTB84DcE7cid7pmvVaAnIBlelotEMJXCPeiy7CpoXbuW00JjGohaMFi9HHWRA16c4IZi PPtlfd+4w6yTDhpa8x0BDemcm0cms5lLsazt9Sb8ucDYUEtnGUNBN85nKlfjIBwLFsV6 46Mkgemqpsw9SxmxRSBYenItihtBl0tmJb3JikROtV5QRiEbrO79dQGOvn1PsdahxdO1 zzPxtlCsiBINR/kUwDbAy8/zHdN0CIATa+JslZ0OEcqTg51BW2WDPIqKR+OLMbv0kB1r awXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ls7u9S1OjhoHGdDMGwVWAZ7jLZpiNyFhjI3hwocaQ4w=; b=iPSHQD0oITuZDmD76nh2jnn3btFwkB8XxEWe9PV1ttt4O0cMXO3vo8TcZ0j+5VYZ6o X5ty0+KOCEiqvzVhocw3g2cHMTv0T2OWGg9CVQOXXtPelJ4te0rVUnTy1Y23N5O/30kf pvNvJnIDbCKBC5XlLFugNdti6o3BtkSrTqlN7p+76nlg4po0IPOYd/VMjj7WlylukPmO 8hv4HiOoN/uO+hUZQE/n+Es0pVzDIg+Nfs+uAC2uQwusVC6+YQLPUFaTIECixwtrMoeB raPmp6mF0T7pxyegOLpGKpxNMoITP511lO9niNVmlSzpYELbZ3mnaluLpikCGklDH1sj Ia8A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkHPwgZ5cLd4GWNjfe6JktDqeoNbIiC8R0cW2qY96xDiQz64Yr 4Nwb2T7g8jKIC+9RilWeZy3z9EoQjJbj2BcP4lU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxrXANmynHaqY4a/twYuj7zpPy1XMJrEFkXgmGYkuRDnee2x32wqiOD5AaGUQQ9H547aF89+jEBXH3RSEpmak0= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:734f:: with SMTP id k15mr9332499uap.28.1562958781700; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:13:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <95208-1561675878.358761@oOx4.pGSX.EcaY> <20190628101238.dscl5mryiilbh5ib@chaz.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:12:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Logo To: justindorfman@gmail.com Cc: Bart Schaefer , Oliver Kiddle , "Zsh Hackers' List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 04:46, Justin Dorfman wrot= e: > > Hey Everyone, > > I gave our designer the feedback and this is what he came back with https= ://cl.ly/aca8f4c2ecab > > I think the icons are great, but the wordmarks need work. I've been playi= ng with different fonts and I'm just not happy yet https://cl.ly/b92d660678= b9 > > Look forward to your feedback. Great logos. The feedback: =E2=80=93 at the first impression I didn't like the mild colors of logos 1,= 3=E2=80=935 =E2=80=93 I liked the second icon-set; the SH in the 2nd logo looks interesting; it's conveying a message: "SHELL", or even "/bin/sh descendant" to then draw watcher's attention to the "Z" on the left, which restores the proper "ZSH" identity; however this is a little complex and too difficult thinking to the watcher as I think it doesn't "flow" enough, i.e. the logo is little to rigid, =E2=80=93 out of the both icon sets I like the 2nd and 7th logos the most; = I'm however also not very excited by the circles. --=20 Sebastian Gniazdowski News: https://twitter.com/ZdharmaI IRC: https://kiwiirc.com/client/chat.freenode.net:+6697/#zplugin Blog: http://zdharma.org