From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9c7c8ba8 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5826 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2018 19:19:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 43799 Received: (qmail 57 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Nov 2018 19:19:32 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.167.175):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.496792 secs); 07 Nov 2018 19:19:32 -0000 X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VNVwy5e4ShRBnQZdigjIIoobByQUB3ubIt3mfmPEdS4=; b=ryXo61MxSzbKsIGtnoh05NVpCbUeBGQ+tE76MMTvGfUu/yonFdOKoOqSuJwzKGdaI0 orWkeNtMC11EzwklTrw2h8yMK71d5MX+dhes2uHLv74WXjNNt9nn23zbPDpsma8uXIYL ecV6I+1Q5AuwqXjfjKjao7lTEp0Qz6wLcGvuacIhBLt1DQoZPtbR6csSEqHt4lIyGrWo m5FgRHWG368VE4OC5lQAU8+5wNqUt5Q03B1QEVFL4+1J22b/x3gasrZ0uTrnZlEOmzoB FiT6OrCoSyGl+agGzfJw9A5ZOlaoeieXcojv1UZtQ/KG4TBzw05TGQMK0vub9Jsm/FiH 5pZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=VNVwy5e4ShRBnQZdigjIIoobByQUB3ubIt3mfmPEdS4=; b=fSbcK+VdZDTsbpiMSaF/T8t6ZxCJIldzFhZNn2U0itlADY+GpTAdqrX6RU/STHPxW3 fzaJTNDboX1B4E+7oFq+wWoTnNzXxxRSkZylHSwdUQHLERnEVofOy8SHCwkeGLfOflaG Kil+WQ9vPNoXMhcFsHN1l91ofJp+rNnG0ZURttKnswLaOBOxrwhTY7JwGe5Eu3cY+ds9 g/UTkEfxFRUSb9qOzdoxkjBEf8SJJ12XApZODOZRHztzjZayRL0CNRAjhB/dKqEQi3Tk xJMU4q0vSogxVCNz1MaYO6E5XlXbngW0Kz1mpewr8hfD/7COxjYm2pIBx3yTbRU+7A2Q l9Vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIRpXhtDJNUKEFU7rkqzpEtetIshbiEeNfCRE2bSVZvmhnSVAPp I/+S6l6KVNFP2NLlbPqz83eRNDk8MnMUMYfQEZQfxfJG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dGifvJlf1fdKeTwf3Cpb/+AZ9poAe33O7V77tXoFMB3e3alVjicxIZsz+LVVvyPue+g5H3DfsgW09v+wM9Ytk= X-Received: by 2002:aca:3208:: with SMTP id y8-v6mr864914oiy.198.1541618368151; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:19:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:19:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG?] If true-color is used, overlapping colors do not work To: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I was testing on Linux, via docker. $termcap[Co] shows 8, the same $terminfo[colors]. The zsh/nearcolor fails and maybe it could fail a little better? .... -0m38;5;232mtrue39m +0m30mtrue39m ... Was testing: basic region_highlight with near-color (hex-triplets at input) Color 30 is apparently black. Maybe zsh/nearcolor could use (compare against) first 8 or 16 colors when $termcap[Co] <= 8?