From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c22d798e for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27523 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2018 23:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 43889 Received: (qmail 823 invoked by uid 1010); 10 Dec 2018 23:54:31 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.100.2/25112. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.167.181):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 2.419065 secs); 10 Dec 2018 23:54:31 -0000 X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5D+Q64FCp0pD+TO7s1CCCEMygfMMGvIcztWbNdBBxgM=; b=Q+CsR/T4kqIN4tt8/HokjQAIZOGG4ByYDebh9zk6WhHAzExn3Bzuamrn+0tJCs9o85 lt/a1NBGaeqru7/ybkMC1z8sAXxVfbN17li0teCKokqhNrkrYqWBJWBCYUoY2eivabLl eAEZs1TWOVfEKQHTA/xC97I4ZR75LJ8h3MdXrhJf1ZoN+/syTMvUrezQo4aHnvSkl3IS tSN5zUmrjtVq1dnesJL3tX57kqbpiik7zSNLvy/gzLml3t8r69oQdbSBiriayd1JehN0 xT/Pq/JUelCzGBs/DPOIt8wjtwStIo2R0roKIhDBFa2Q02WWlOOLIsC99Oaqtp1gtT5t 3jNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5D+Q64FCp0pD+TO7s1CCCEMygfMMGvIcztWbNdBBxgM=; b=VSzL4Sdu9SdfGWGyzC58Mgikw5xEtu+9fjav+0O4Ddnw8VKxwKB5YeUth21JcZaUpu CuhxOwiLyHTG1SU8NNIcJPXAH1HiVP5PBAXD/3VqweMdYEFwMfYf834QecfREMorRokG K33CdgNR64SHN47U1Xa8Q1BRQbvfM2R010cnQgv9nsQk/Ti3ZHg7eJQZM2HPlaU05zGE BaZMjfGcCa+2tMMyckmfGAOVDMT19Aiwfz2xLe0KVUJmvJDTMkcLyJ8eUbj3DlKm7dAt YFmdZSAU8yCWI0Crrgezp97+iLuCn/hqqJqwN7PjeE3TZurNi6jcd+uJuJ5dczm52Gbl XM9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYYoxwTkcG7iZg0lOB4mZnv3LQtRlYGmNeGOSWZi+RlM37tMfcV +ljG2ooWHTfSwB9/h58zUxPrwSP19dr0/iM6uLI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UEATYs/TuIfISdVkqdukhKk6aduO8EM8FgjsmjZKqduxbF2yAr0gWZYeJq1BMXOU/A4xEzES2F4tt+vg6aQDI= X-Received: by 2002:aca:cc0d:: with SMTP id c13mr80736oig.150.1544486066284; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:54:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2362-1541646201.813952@nGIL.zWP_.YhaK> <20626-1541726901.821000@xGvJ.shtD.SkCN> <31159-1543080743.164776@h8df.-SiL.hblq> <34192-1544410467.201850@fxvz.2eq1.BJLG> In-Reply-To: From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:54:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: highlight test cases (was Re: [BUG?] If true-color is used, overlapping colors do not work) To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 00:51, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 03:54, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > > > > On 30 Nov, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote: > > > The output doesn't follow zsh_highlight replacements for start-code > > > and end-code and still emits raw codes. > > > > > > Could this be fixed? > > > > That was intentional. As I stated in 43759 which was the message > > including the true color patch: > > > > | The actual escape sequences appear to be quite standard and are, for > > | now, hard coded. We should probably support some zle_highlight fields > > | similar to fg_start_code to allow them to be configured but I'm unsur= e > > | of what exact form that should take. > > That said, not everything was hard-coded =E2=80=93 zle_highlight was resp= ected > by the true color patch. Oh, I know see you were referring to additional zle_highlight fields. I think this means that the uncommon situation can be responded to by an update to Zshell (i.e. introduction of additional zle_highlight field(s)). --=20 Sebastian Gniazdowski News: https://twitter.com/ZdharmaI IRC: https://kiwiirc.com/client/chat.freenode.net:+6697/#zplugin Blog: http://zdharma.org