From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6d95c991 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8497 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2019 16:44:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 44485 Received: (qmail 2622 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Jul 2019 16:44:05 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-oi1-f180.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.101.2/25496. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.167.180):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 3.785723 secs); 02 Jul 2019 16:44:05 -0000 X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.167.180 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=03LG7KKI92NN8qKt905zjV0QGCivL00SXzyQOqlVfcs=; b=phW7AZWWiS6ohkU4OGXWSQWb7ytHTv0x2Qi2LE1Ve7BpiCK2JeZp31V0qhWMZ9SsfS FhIR93BeKx7OhE+HriBaUlWprQ1SLuE4reLkbsTrpt9NiMK2IAqIONrq08pjSbx0duvO cM4d78NCvgH07kuqXz+j0w6ZsPyphqrywK/ozbD51PGsv/OeGa+5UoqPRzifba1s8D/b 0wb1OlZ+Ka7pIOwPOZDPWtayY8opJR633YrzTARvym/Je0pF9eq0kG5T483BD8+Nvm2L t5Am2bdjgGuQjQsbIUtpSJ+IfPqbHyuCiSIQIhQU8Cw2W7biIUl1SlBEaKWb8yz6KXoZ FldQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=03LG7KKI92NN8qKt905zjV0QGCivL00SXzyQOqlVfcs=; b=R3TSsXHKgSB4HQESlRuqgyKfrogCIcWNj/WRhLOcvYIAVH2fI4twwf2lkVDaPzk3IJ 3peqL4VwJ9BQ19hiD67NM1mKUc5IsYqbpSUmclDKXlPPTaIk0cYxU2LA4pHHcBECe3jg WHL68NBAu9n4HQfTxhndHUeoFmLy6l77S6DVHbiI26XMeIX0w63AUJ5ALevyao1IWPk7 VrMfh1uENN2ZSFAxp3yfURpT0HnFHf92J2SoceaB0SrxstL6AvborZzqyqjTcxD5JtZh zDxCnCB1G7sdlqQu+9NYpOiHh5HeohrqddGCfQw1nx+Q0Hj/uIgOcrfnuvQrUzvHPkVq V+Ew== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVtE6g1uFCgLMexL6VNb5n0eX8w94KaD1PEKrFFTXwW4QCVvGRD FM7lTClq5mgPoQUK+JmMgKo3caAq2hkP6kWSe2pRcrfU X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUv50dFu813S+Xxfwms9038RRHWNMAoVklbISBR78k/KmFK2HkKNmFBZch5BKEpTZL8CAxIzg5w73HPp0hZY8= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1a0e:: with SMTP id a14mr3252559oia.51.1562085807987; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:43:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190701100001.hbegs7zyu2auckhf@chaz.gmail.com> <1561975733.6006.2.camel@samsung.com> <1561994908.6006.19.camel@samsung.com> <20190701162202.5o3cxahc75e2hucz@chaz.gmail.com> <1561999973.6006.21.camel@samsung.com> <1562057976.5684.3.camel@samsung.com> <20190702122018.mytrtge3rq42nouf@chaz.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190702122018.mytrtge3rq42nouf@chaz.gmail.com> From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 18:43:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: <(...), >(...) and fds above 9 To: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 14:21, Stephane Chazelas wrote: > Neither ksh93 nor bash close the fds opened with > { cat <(ls -l /proc/self/fd; } {fd}< file > (that syntax doesn't work in zsh as already reported). Can I ask you what do you mean by closing the descriptor? I recently often do exec {FD}< <(some code); zle -F $FD handler and it is working, which to me appears as the FD not being closed?