From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-42606-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 3168 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2018 11:37:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 42606
Received: (qmail 5561 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Apr 2018 11:37:22 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.218.42):SA:0(-1.1/5.0):. 
 Processed in 15.061795 secs); 07 Apr 2018 11:37:22 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BOUND_DIGITS_15,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=97C1lyljpnE79tzZpTAbdnI3XyljcqpNgWDNc2UszFY=;
        b=YJbpVZGmMyGD8TNHq06jkhmL31KDLk3i6MT7UT4doCSS/S4MN/1qUozdro1UrcBanl
         vnWX9BamCEAWuQB2u1nJN7JwFpNsukf0Xx7iSuKz+gSI9rWFVYHeTXs+SuYXKxsBddVc
         VpiUqQ5vi7SssRuzPP3cDG63QTc14FvG2b2UgXfiKrZok3l4qBPvH32kYlLcy1yTqiKj
         zsv6lig0GvO2DJt/a/qz9+MBmLKgxpzRd6uoaQmYzMUC3zdacxUifJclNcVMzT1eGePy
         V4ayl1CElqtLasEajo9QcRA18+9Hm0Yvy97XiT6V1xHQKyq9VOSUx7M1r/278uFt9yEK
         jUuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=97C1lyljpnE79tzZpTAbdnI3XyljcqpNgWDNc2UszFY=;
        b=tgvSwbtcOXhP9pxKd0yzi/x+Ge8q41MaHk4fgjjtWNhpv7S2NMziskJbf4TtTDzC6i
         VacxZK6R66sgcKieu8+9CwZvqlzbqoVV0n67kiXhNC3c6eO4g6BDo4msivUVW7A3ot9x
         TMGX5xTN04zSHea9r6b98/Uhcz9CKQca9vwiyvuz0cDU0C9nZsSYQ1Sl8o9EbMC6ZkyM
         eQ8xZbpnbP0vSYR5K3jF8GEXWg/5YS6jryC5LSA2rQYKdtnQAnQRGd/lmBf0Po3crGTR
         mTTljnD3zLhmEjBZerHAYbkXfu0D130zMqqppQzxWkclVZY+PjgPgmzIpabAW+W+CikN
         LzIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FUezAS3LuySsu90RzE7gWl4IHTfE7D6d9qDzFQNoHnGW942FTV
	7ZF7CZsN3QQ56IdI8nXH2stbyqTA4sciOSO8cTM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+nB9JbUkt76SK+pZT5fhC0mDcqo7RlsKCfpxVTpK5+tB/zHctcOIrBL0UV6U/plNsutIDfxO1UTtP7O7femWY=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ad4a:: with SMTP id w71-v6mr17817569oie.231.1523101024284;
 Sat, 07 Apr 2018 04:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <32761.1523065994@thecus>
References: <32761.1523065994@thecus>
From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 13:36:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKc7PVCbGEeU3vN9Dmn85eNODiGQi5VfWbfk_qzrnTz8fHJNbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: properly unset the zle registers hash
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008276290569409793"

--0000000000008276290569409793
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On 7 April 2018 at 03:53, Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Though, mapfile triggers the address sanitizer for an invalid
> free before I can verify this path with it.
>

mapfile has significant room for quality and feature improvements, but the
fact that metafication and unicode are in the way is discouraging. I mean,
to find character N=1000, one has to traverse buffer with mbtowc, counting
unicode characters. So one feature could be allowing to index by bytes,
with use case like: get last 1000 bytes from large log file, then process
as unicode string, extracting last 10 lines. Metafication is in the way,
getarg/getindex cannot be customized like getter and setter, so
byte-indexing is problematic.

-- 
Best regards,
Sebastian Gniazdowski

--0000000000008276290569409793--