I attach the patch that withdraws 9f8e3e8 and 643aca9 (which are 36834)

Best regards,
Sebastian Gniazdowski

On 22 October 2015 at 17:00, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22,  2:49pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
> }
> } My conclusions:
> } - 36834 introduces high memory usage; I would suggest to use only two
> } optimizations -- newheaps and zhalloc; my znavtools are instant fast
> } with them, what's slower is searching (wrote search_test function,
> } results attached)
>
> My apologies, but I'm not sure I followed all of that.  Can you produce
> a diff against commit 8e9a68ad14655c1949b1a04d5715a5caa8c344ee that
> shows the situation you think is the best so far?
>
> } - still not sure why 36834 allocates much memory for the string test
>
> Seeing the aforementioned diff may provide a hint.
>
> } - newheaps makes function calls longer, but it's not a substantial
> } difference
>
> 14% is pretty substantial, but it's probably all gained back if the
> function does anything significant with local variables.