From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27847 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2015 08:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36849 Received: (qmail 22910 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2015 08:21:41 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=KtUmaJB+UoRypJpNDYT8+tUfwxFwRbqv8mEjaJmHeyc=; b=T+9bCJAXX/3wV8qQNP5zlfG+jfSkGWCsU4jraJyaLZpKYgeARA0cBAhx6wGeqvvVAx lGH8q7kRD20dtCRDwK7HV71sEaGP7cm5RTspqcFHu5Aj8HfzethhPCBzNhTfFykpPVKM SXDVhz4OSiPkqqXlECE1pubVXQdxhDkEzaMy2sUw1zoSj4sBCv/1BmR5h5Kzoyv48gIA RkRmJCiNYsdDWkFh0FoXUEmvWE+Ldcre7dyYlXLpLSvRSHY1hwRGB8nuf5jJwo2sGm7V nRzCBNzCJbTYSFtEfQ+0vknjP7iXVbqJWwsbNh/E4RUG2APELO+mGceBFXmvlLEh+puw ngZg== X-Received: by 10.25.168.16 with SMTP id r16mr9572205lfe.54.1444724497305; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:21:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <151012173304.ZM15477@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <151010105849.ZM10144@torch.brasslantern.com> <151010170623.ZM16166@torch.brasslantern.com> <151010232045.ZM12931@torch.brasslantern.com> <151011091757.ZM27755@torch.brasslantern.com> <151011103121.ZM8814@torch.brasslantern.com> <151011142204.ZM9103@torch.brasslantern.com> <151012070105.ZM15099@torch.brasslantern.com> <151012173304.ZM15477@torch.brasslantern.com> From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:21:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Slowdown around 5.0.5-dev-0 To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 13 October 2015 at 02:33, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Oct 12, 6:50pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote: > } Maybe the numbers mean something? > > Yes, they're an ID assigned every time a heap is either pushed or freed; > e.g.: I meant that maybe the numbers yield some optimization strategy. I think we did a great job speeding up memory-heavy Zsh 6.5 (typical execution) or 11.5 times (use of patterns on arrays). Thank you for your effort (my tools greatly benefit), credits are mostly to you. I would try to implement something more. Have you any more ideas for optimization strategies? Basing on your description of heap mechanism I could try to implement it. But maybe there is nothing left to be done? Best regards, Sebastian Gniazdowski