From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-37334-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 6312 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2015 05:01:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 37334
Received: (qmail 9782 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2015 05:01:03 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=y6GfMtjee8xixMziYhkvm/w8rvzj+++LUVAuXz5a1pk=;
        b=cFFs1frt2xeiXpB9Mtgnq1RXvoIi53J8PY06P8ouU/NhdGsIWj212suAqnBf3QbZ/a
         xOVzyPg8/FmZgKTH7JVy6Fbs7IKwfT7O4qkxfJ5EvxsAHhvxcsDeCv002cBbmwVYXQIF
         4qgKXzSU05GepTIsLyheqLU7lpg+zxpozM2OOk0ix5YNVS0GEfGJzK9QMFdfosES2vvX
         OOgo06zvlgFllheDG2Dtjt6aeFk5WW0gyi6ohiYVNWdU7Rf+6QlHk4l0m9JY+65fmSFr
         VAfkWWZOW5eyV03vySwAzuNspOvLvvOdY+45wtaz8ffm8TEqHdVdYJeXcfctNa9sBFvF
         qTKA==
X-Received: by 10.25.213.145 with SMTP id m139mr13274566lfg.150.1449464461324;
 Sun, 06 Dec 2015 21:01:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <151206151913.ZM31274@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <CAKc7PVC3DuHh=HAeNXt5-7-GWARXrThd8avyV01Encyt=FQbEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <151206151913.ZM31274@torch.brasslantern.com>
From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 06:00:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKc7PVDk57HzcAvfdzcY6Z_hNpw7mk2P+aN4P7w_4BSUkhgbFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: getarg() called twice?
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 7 December 2015 at 00:19, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> I suspect therefore that this is either a side-effect of your new code,
> or it's a side-effect of something in your shell environment (precmd,
> preexec, etc.)

It was preexec. Sorry for bothering you.

Best regards,
Sebastian Gniazdowski