From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-44562-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5d04adc1
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Sun, 21 Jul 2019 06:20:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 24 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2019 06:20:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 44562
Received: (qmail 3048 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Jul 2019 06:20:14 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-io1-f48.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.101.2/25510. spamassassin: 3.4.2.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.166.48):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 2.94536 secs); 21 Jul 2019 06:20:14 -0000
X-Envelope-From: roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.166.48 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=jJxFGRT+nFVWy1VmZ+lLWD163mxh2CHbdVwRh32s9u0=;
        b=I+zuBmCFhNoJjNT+ipEz/FMTkrdteb0dnrqkxQZ8z62sWVNAqZsj1zGiiQdC+YuAk4
         r0hPtKjtmHtyxATMVrxZUcunFHdha1pGKBSH8CyWObC0SJq+RxAZeN49oRAp5FPDYL2I
         h19SPHq/PgdlcdMIvX6ICq61V5zO6W53CwrVkxnX6Pqv4J5TOnX+JMpVWIDheWz+Id7u
         UdHd7xBI/Xa7I+2DrDtKYlh2iGX2fgX/G0XHIB4xjphMtasqOY2d69Ouqbp7SUFBqtEM
         2L2iXo4keDoylO4N7dWhpNZ5wKgvgnD1pbkheb3Uz2UtwzPhb2gX9ti0yLTFocgIJYWi
         02Kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=jJxFGRT+nFVWy1VmZ+lLWD163mxh2CHbdVwRh32s9u0=;
        b=a0FiqfpGToj7HWI41QXt8jdV5wwCFEmSiiCSMBbAW+A5Byfa4XSZbahjkiGKjEARYG
         +WjMrbP1ar3ZDP+qtXVYYij36qO4pY2hnBSt0POmRDbmfIV2+xHbSb7j4HwxmlJaZcdl
         cKx3RpF1ZrRrl/5KMozRUQIzFaYCqewzu8TuMCDLUtG2eGgaBnvER5NszQGv9z7+YcQz
         WseJrP1YykgNu7tfJlQ3HDJ5/PmnHNZVhKUpCugC7y8vkoErF6/pxG+YQXjomy54FEOw
         uUvwVpDBi3WtT42zz2aBTk3aeYJVJzFm3f8TW7cdl9oxPK7RebaCUiHlKCocYD02csrv
         /2Xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHBLXkvyVNqq2vEmlkV0hIyx4nutFgExgYIwUO2EXBhwhwSGYi
	mmuhv+moOxgv59RiTx0C62Pjes96xRmcPophrcmypmqKsfw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzCnGu6sXX1zC3fLwjanqR1HIJPZc9yYRpI2sc5THD8ruHaUZez1oqjjccwMU56sV/uFedjgZGkmIcurAcHMhI=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:528a:: with SMTP id d132mr61936711jab.68.1563689977266;
 Sat, 20 Jul 2019 23:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 08:19:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAN=4vMp4pMM1JHKVYz9Wzr1N8qhwZ4auXGThFTkA-BFWHgvOyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Jobs unexpectedly disowned
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I'm seeing weird behavior with jobs getting disowned and I'm not sure
whether it's intended.

Code:

    function f1() { sleep 1 & }
    function f2() { sleep 1 &; true }

    function g1() { f1; jobs; wait }
    function g2() { f2; jobs; wait }

    echo g1; g1
    echo g2; g2

When ran from `zsh -df` I get this:

    g1
    [2] 31060
    [2]  + running    sleep 1
    [2]  + done       sleep 1

    g2
    [2] 31061

I expected the output from g2 to look the same as from g1 but it's
different. Somehow the background job gets disowned when f2 returns.
However, this doesn't happen if I call f2 directly instead of going
through g2.

    f2; jobs; wait
    [2] 31137
    [2]  + running    sleep 1
    [2]  + done       sleep 1

Is this behavior intended?

Roman.