From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: (qmail 23433 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2020 16:11:49 -0000
Received: from ns1.primenet.com.au (HELO primenet.com.au) (203.24.36.2)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with UTF8ESMTPZ; 27 Apr 2020 16:11:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 28516 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2020 16:11:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 45725
Received: (qmail 29867 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Apr 2020 16:11:39 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-io1-f43.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.102.2/25793. spamassassin: 3.4.4.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.166.43):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.460753 secs); 27 Apr 2020 16:11:39 -0000
X-Envelope-From: roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.166.43 as permitted sender)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=gJs9OW32Mci8xWHOo0UzAoauQw1CQaAK4E6j6zk8nGc=;
        b=Wd6o1V3RsqJkxNmCV+x0ots2FN7BPEeq7mHRtBQKH0v7crmv3ITRvFyIu+U7/6g1W+
         nfj70d4wifMLrqYmSLonpBdk9mIbTnpw8j9YXKO4Vo/Qi5YfAZOHAJ7baeP4ZcBRyTBb
         EmM1xpWltyjT0rIdoam3M6AijbKmqiGT7bZoXOo29ga2ihCuvroSS7/z9AXdqGswRHsd
         CSNgYWZ8I4fgTGgwlZhS4/YGU9deklT5U4XbI0zyB1SBBSm53C3+sb/9OcYwJPGg13hv
         0fIpd17wPaboOn1FjFw0ob2Lr6uaWIy83b4q5IVCZTJKOvk+9VOXSZItddJ4xfG9QIsz
         6F9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZvBoZZh14EtVN4YqsZ3XGD96kO2NqK0/N9Y+4uTbsjiz+inPm9
	0XwraTNJISpbeSqOqeepV1a2EqDRF0yRuIRFhpYNQS0e
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLwFE6LMUxXoA/l4qtD+77le7rOZi7tMojRii+cl1YVT8QviWdsF/4LtuYn+Q/EWl456KeH6kn/8bBGhlR7rLw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9c02:: with SMTP id 2mr21735580ioe.67.1588003863501;
 Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200427101430.447e2a21@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
In-Reply-To: <20200427101430.447e2a21@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
From: Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:10:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAN=4vMpWqnb+uVjXdPa9E+c4kLMPt4z0gaScPeYthHuA1m4EMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zstyle: "more specific" patterns and *-components
To: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:15 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> WDYT?

My reading of the documentation matches yours, so I also expected the
behavior you expected (which isn't the actual behavior). I also find
the documented behavior preferable to the actual behavior.

My experience with zstyle is minuscule, so appraising my opinion at 2
cents would be too generous.

Roman.