From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0d930218 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 13:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18801 invoked by alias); 20 May 2019 13:56:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 44343 Received: (qmail 24380 invoked by uid 1010); 20 May 2019 13:56:05 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-io1-f44.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.101.2/25454. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.166.44):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 3.322271 secs); 20 May 2019 13:56:05 -0000 X-Envelope-From: roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.166.44 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YcbuDlgGc9NUK7r3+RRW/qTCJfG2qc4j4yplpKtsFu8=; b=BaXGm7YXmm6UFkhyRq3OEncRdmuazKqPLZbWjhPMN5PC2GM9DK8oYftLTzhs+jXVqZ 1WZalI9yBfL0uNdCPLlI+vM+wn4KGsP8ZUlAT/X2hQ6DD0UKvW9b6OP2QoydTOaOdJvD Xfxdh87cd2DXyx13Fuy+kPeSrOEUHbReBwQfOHmC++b269kIjt67DbDSJgM3AC47qDLg Say+/r7+Y4qd8zyy+HUsQCCh/+wf8YrB9N4af+kZZzK68q1+L4JxnU0RnrXUsZjPtsH6 NWTT66rI4jbIQpKft4d9c1ajIclU4BwOVECPSIsq1sZTVKfJk0qtzMhDtbn2VkFjpvuO LWAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YcbuDlgGc9NUK7r3+RRW/qTCJfG2qc4j4yplpKtsFu8=; b=bHkaFTugb59meHsbCmKcTqHhsnaVmzlaLWy+XBKFe/AGGzUsECh5QiXY7d3xPFXgVR bcVM8QUv+ToD06zlGp7CWzeb0avH3x7SrDw5u+uC87ebBflxtDJSfIQhJRoKekQ0EcSv YivIhVEjMdQ/jW4kNCPFoqs4ilcYlVfwmi9oLoJ/naDPQoyYjnZHlbTpdgApXUEHhJe9 W54klH7Lro+Rt+frgRQcZjzZpf330M+go2X2dtu8QIIP67++m7wFEYLshKZjr8xMwHZF NqIwrwrh0Q7gwMpOfxTehvkg2jtZ65+Oq1TB7uhsBdOlxLghxky6Pd4ydMIsa5oiXl/x ujDg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXWflM0uc128BaqdiDC1j6fZDf/YFjU0mAVd40jyRPOlqF2zsew suJ6rKFUeiCXGAsf3WbQ04szWjELbJL1JAAdQy0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQzuXJK/pD9zcHvf0oJ+quN/p/7qGDyfBVScSumkmswZUZOSZ5QPZfT6h8QwPH/GPvse5z6H7QiwveiJiCgnE= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9306:: with SMTP id l6mr7505112ion.168.1558360529409; Mon, 20 May 2019 06:55:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <68081d8c-1aa6-203b-eb6c-e2d048de1340@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> In-Reply-To: From: Roman Perepelitsa Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 15:55:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Incorrect cursor position when ZLE_RPROMPT_INDENT=0 (with a fix) To: Charles Blake Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c99ad6058952158f" --000000000000c99ad6058952158f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:28 PM Charles Blake wrote: > Yeah. I had used rprompt-indent (because that's what was mentioned here, > and I wasn't sure how finished your rprompt-indent2 branch was). I also > see the rprompt-indent2 version working in both modes of xterm reverseWrap > (though I imagine everyone here can test xterm easily enough). I have no > more counter examples/suggestions, myself. > Thanks for confirming that it works with the rprompt-indent2 patch. Just to clarify, all testing that I've reported previously on this thread was done with this patch. Roman. --000000000000c99ad6058952158f--