From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-40012-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 19742 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2016 12:29:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 40012
Received: (qmail 17978 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2016 12:29:37 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from rcpt-mqugw.biglobe.ne.jp by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(133.208.100.4):SA:0(-2.9/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.371957 secs); 24 Nov 2016 12:29:37 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at spf01.biglobe.ne.jp designates 133.208.100.4 as permitted sender)
X-Biglobe-Sender: <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimization of getarrvalue()
From: "Jun T." <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <CAH+w=7YN-pzoGn5AC260sS3yLMKRL0kjaSY1zMihRKs5wEiM1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 20:49:11 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D3BEF64B-BE34-4260-A4F3-A11EEC2E0D30@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
References: <CGME20161108201233epcas1p1e2900e2d67af8b8558ebdb70eb7ad480@epcas1p1.samsung.com> <1478635899.1897979.781551353.05792438@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161109114207.6b929440@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <161109080328.ZM6075@torch.brasslantern.com> <D5F098D6-752E-4CEC-92F6-6303BD9B2348@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <20161115195721.43648236@ntlworld.com> <77EB3614-F9E2-4BEB-B93C-99DFD34A504F@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <161116105013.ZM32526@torch.brasslantern.com> <F678A4CE-CDBD-4BCE-BB43-DB55FFA82073@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <CAH+w=7YN-pzoGn5AC260sS3yLMKRL0kjaSY1zMihRKs5wEiM1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Biglobe-Spnum: 59575


On 2016/11/24, at 9:55, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:

>> More generally, $a[i,j] with i=$#a+1 is treated specially.
> 
> ??  It's not treated any differently than i=$#a+N for any N >=0, is it?

Suppose we have an array with two elements ($#a = 2)
% a=(one two)
and see what is returned by
% nargs "${(@)a[i,j]}"

For i >= 4 or i <= -3 it returns 1 if j >= i,
while for i=3 (=$#a+1) it returns 0 always.

But, as I said before, if no one is complaining about this we can leave
it as is.