From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27883 invoked from network); 26 Aug 1999 12:23:07 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Aug 1999 12:23:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 11386 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 1999 12:22:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7501 Received: (qmail 11378 invoked from network); 26 Aug 1999 12:22:52 -0000 Subject: Re: whatis DYNAMIC_NAME_CLASH_OK In-Reply-To: <199908261155.NAA65383@numa1.igpm.rwth-aachen.de> from "jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de" at "Aug 26, 1999 1:55:52 pm" To: jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 13:22:45 +0100 (BST) Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk, fletch@phydeaux.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL48 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Zefram jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: >1.) What's the heck with DYNAMIC_NAME_CLASH_OK ? That's from a configure test, which checks whether you can load multiple modules that define symbols with the same name. The reason for it is that, on systems that permit it, all setup functions are named "setup_" (and the other module functions similarly), so that a module works independently of its filename. -zefram