From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29097 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 17:06:20 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 17:06:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 28879 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 1999 17:06:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8170 Received: (qmail 28872 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 17:06:15 -0000 Subject: Re: PATCH: prompt fun In-Reply-To: <19991007130320.B4365@dman.com> from Clint Adams at "Oct 7, 1999 1: 3:20 pm" To: schizo@debian.org (Clint Adams) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 18:06:13 +0100 (BST) Cc: zefram@fysh.org, zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL48 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Zefram Clint Adams wrote: >So the authors of such additions could easily put their code under >the GPL with a special provision to allow inclusion by zsh. It's simpler than that. If they distribute the files under the zsh license, or anything allowing redistribution under the zsh license (such as making it completely public domain), then we can distribute the files with zsh under the zsh license. This doesn't stop them also distributing the same files under the GPL or any other license. (Perl, for example, is simultaneously distributed under the Artistic license and the GPL.) -zefram