From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-9124-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 12897 invoked from network); 20 Dec 1999 22:23:11 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Dec 1999 22:23:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 330 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 1999 22:23:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 9124
Received: (qmail 323 invoked from network); 20 Dec 1999 22:23:05 -0000
To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Re: complist bug and PATCH: spelling 
In-reply-to: "Oliver Kiddle"'s message of "Fri, 17 Dec 1999 13:47:26 GMT."
             <385A3EEE.15917530@u.genie.co.uk> 
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 22:24:19 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Message-Id: <E120BCq-0005sG-00.1999-12-20-22-23-04@mail3.svr.pol.co.uk>

Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> My second, unrelated point is that the plural of index is indices, not
> indexes.

Only for in the mathematical sense.  Compilers of indexes (for books) are
quite particular that the plural is regular in that case, unlike the
English language in any *@!!* case.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>