From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-9516-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 4188 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2000 20:50:25 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Feb 2000 20:50:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 17139 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2000 20:50:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 9516
Received: (qmail 17131 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2000 20:50:18 -0000
To: ZSH-workers@sunsite.auc.dk
Subject: Re: PATCH: mmap error 
In-reply-to: "Peter Stephenson"'s message of "Tue, 01 Feb 2000 18:45:39 GMT."
             <E12FiG6-0008Up-00.2000-02-01-18-42-39@mail12.svr.pol.co.uk> 
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 20:53:16 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Message-Id: <E12FkFc-0002J4-00.2000-02-01-20-50-16@mail1.svr.pol.co.uk>

Peter Stephenson wrote:
> The following is basically the same, but more consistent with the other
> allocation failures in mem.c

Sorry, I wrote this yesterday and sent it out without looking at the new
mail.  I've instead applied Sven's patch in 9505, which is the same but
tests for -1 (i.e. MAP_FAILED), which is correct.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>