From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17763 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2000 17:51:56 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Apr 2000 17:51:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27208 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2000 17:51:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10558 Received: (qmail 27197 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2000 17:51:44 -0000 Subject: Re: PATCH: AIX dep.&doc fix; development guidelines In-Reply-To: <1000406173943.ZM16628@candle.brasslantern.com> from Bart Schaefer at "Apr 6, 2000 05:39:43 pm" To: Bart Schaefer Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 18:51:25 +0100 (BST) CC: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Zefram Bart Schaefer wrote: >No, what file am I going to grep *in*, not what pattern am I looking for. >I don't have an archive of zsh-workers and don't want one. I want to be >able to use http://www.zsh.org/mla/ or the equivalent. Searching for >"zefram1" turns up one message from 1998. The mailing list archive seems to be updated once a day, so you can't find today's patches yet (but then of course you couldn't look them up by sequence number either). As for what "zefram1" et al return, I'd forgotten that that form would clash with old subversion numbers. I'm going to skip ahead 100 numbers, therefore, to get past that clash. I suggest that everyone else using this scheme start off at patch "pws100" etc. -zefram