From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18512 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2000 18:52:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Apr 2000 18:52:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 25483 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2000 18:52:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10561 Received: (qmail 25464 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2000 18:52:21 -0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: Tags again In-reply-to: "Sven Wischnowsky"'s message of "Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:26:35 +0200." <200004061126.NAA06689@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 19:52:10 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Message-Id: Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > The manual says that the tags are tried `one after another'. I.e. it > first offers globbed-files, if that fails directories, etc. It does > *not* offer them all at once. Eh? tag-order This provides a mechanism for sorting how the tags available in a particular context will be used. zsh 3.1.6-dev-21 April 2, 2000 29 ZSHCOMPSYS(1) ZSHCOMPSYS(1) The values for the style are sets of space-sepa- rated lists of tags. The tags in each value will be tried at the same time; if no match is found, the next value is used. Are you saying this doesn't apply to files? Or that ordering in file-patterns takes precedence? Or that it's not supposed to work any more (and if so, how do I get tags from other sources offered at the same time, and why does it appear to be happening with all the various things in command position)? And if tag-order isn't useful with files, what's the point of having to name the tags (which until a few hours ago was compulsory)? Now I'm immensely confused. -- Peter Stephenson Work: pws@CambridgeSiliconRadio.com Web: http://www.pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk