From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9144 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2000 20:20:28 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Apr 2000 20:20:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 4400 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2000 20:19:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10671 Received: (qmail 4385 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2000 20:19:14 -0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Question In-reply-to: "Sven Wischnowsky"'s message of "Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:05:41 +0200." <200004100805.KAA13666@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:19:10 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Message-Id: Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > Currently, if a completion list is too long, the completion system > asks if onw wants to see all matches. This is not only ugly in > cases like _complete_help with styles-output -- it askes if one wants > to see all `0' matches. > > Should we change it to mention the number of lines needed? I think it > would always be more interesting. Yes, it would. I suppose this is too deep to be able to use a style. -- Peter Stephenson Work: pws@CambridgeSiliconRadio.com Web: http://www.pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk