From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10410 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 21:13:41 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 May 2000 21:13:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 19016 invoked by alias); 17 May 2000 21:13:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11447 Received: (qmail 18961 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 21:13:30 -0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: _telnet niggle Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 22:13:24 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Message-Id: It's a small but non-zero niggle that _telnet doesn't use hosts-ports, just users-hosts-ports. The most common usage for telnet in my experience is not to specify the host on the command line, even if you give the port. Consequently it probably ought to use hosts-ports if there is no user (luckily that's the first thing it gets if there is one). There may be other combinations with similar niggles; it's a thankless task tracking this sort of thing down. -- Peter Stephenson Work: pws@CambridgeSiliconRadio.com Web: http://www.pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk