From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11257 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2000 18:09:14 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Dec 2000 18:09:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 20347 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2000 18:09:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13303 Received: (qmail 20340 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2000 18:09:06 -0000 Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: vicmd bindings In-Reply-To: <20001218120250.A28320@dman.com> from Clint Adams at "Dec 18, 2000 12:02:50 pm" To: Clint Adams Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:09:04 +0000 (GMT) CC: Zefram , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Zefram Clint Adams wrote: >It doesn't appear to do so here. up-line-or-history leaves the cursor >at the end of the line rather than the same column. up-line-or-history leaves the cursor in the same column, as vi does, when moving between lines within a single command. When it moves to a prior history entry it does move to the end of the line; I'm in two minds as to whether that should be changed. -zefram