From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13309-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 5671 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2000 19:28:06 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Dec 2000 19:28:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 20907 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2000 19:27:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13309
Received: (qmail 20900 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2000 19:27:59 -0000
Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: vicmd bindings
In-Reply-To: <20001221082857.A28550@dman.com> from Clint Adams at "Dec 21, 2000
 08:28:57 am"
To: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 19:27:54 +0000 (GMT)
CC: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>, zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E149Xr8-0002KS-00@crucigera.fysh.org>
From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>

Clint Adams wrote:
>Based on what factors?

It seems vaguely sensible to move to the end of the line when going to
an separate history entry, which is effectively a new file to edit.
However, on reflection I've decided that it makes more sense for the
`-line-or-history' commands to place the cursor on the target line in
a consistent manner.

-zefram