From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13800-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 3957 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2001 19:12:13 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Mar 2001 19:12:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 25840 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2001 19:12:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13800
Received: (qmail 25828 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2001 19:12:06 -0000
Subject: Re: "setopt noexec" and interactive shells
In-Reply-To: <E14hxtw-0005n6-00@crucigera.fysh.org> from Zefram at "Mar 27, 2001
 07:09:04 pm"
To: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:12:06 +0100 (BST)
CC: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com>, zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E14hysw-0006W6-00@crucigera.fysh.org>
From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>

Oh, and whichever way it's implemented in the end, it'll have to be
documented.  Something like "This option has no effect if INTERACTIVE
is on." in the EXEC entry in zshoptions(1), obviously varying according
to the semantics that are eventually implemented.

-zefram