From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6016 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 02:24:35 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 02:24:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 20202 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2001 02:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14020 Received: (qmail 20190 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 02:24:26 -0000 Subject: Re: PATCH: honor STRIPFLAGS for modules In-Reply-To: <20010418213942.A15845@dman.com> from Clint Adams at "Apr 18, 2001 09:39:42 pm" To: Clint Adams Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:24:24 +0100 (BST) CC: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Zefram Clint Adams wrote: >Are there platforms where one would want STRIPFLAGS to be different >for the shared objects? On some systems (I think all a.out systems, definitely occurs on SunOS 4), stripping a shared object prevents it being dynamically linked. There's a configure test for this. As a result, stripping-related flags have to be handled separately for the executable and for modules. -zefram